| 關 鍵 詞： |
法治；合法性；整全性；規則手冊；權利；程序；形式法治觀；實質法治觀；人性尊嚴 |
| 中文摘要： |
德沃金的法哲學一直是當代法理學界的重要研究課題，不過卻鮮少有人對其法治思想作過深入探討。因此，本文擬從德沃金法理論的兩個重要概念「合法性」與「整全性」著手，以對其法治觀進行審視與反思。德沃金早期將法治區分為兩種模式，規則手冊模式與權利模式，並且明確捍衛以實質權利為本的法治觀。對此，Jeremy Waldron 提出不同解讀，他宣稱德沃金實際上偏向程序論的法治觀，也就是著重「以一定方法來論證公權力如何行使」的法治理論。然而本文認為，Waldron 的看法並非對德沃金法治思想的正確解讀，因為德沃金在最近的著作中明白宣示：合法性（法治）價值乃法律的理想概念，而整全性則是最具政治道德說服力的法治價值。依此，本文進一步分析整全性的構成要素（詮釋性要素、正當性要素、評價性要素及整體性要素），同時根據 Brim Tamanaha 對形式與實質法治理論的學理考察，論證德沃金的理論蘊含厚實的實質法治思想，其核心論旨是要捍衛他的「人性尊嚴」倫理觀，主張每一個人都有同等客觀價值並且負有追求成功人生的道德責任。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
rule of law；legality；integrity；rule-book；rights；procedure；formal conception of the rule of law；substantive conception of the rule of law；human dignity |
| 英文摘要： |
Ronald Dworkin's legal philosophy remains an important research area in contemporary jurisprudential scholarship. Nevertheless, few studies have offered an in-depth critical examination of his theory of Rule of Law. The present study reflects critically on Dworkin's conception of Rule of Law by focusing on two crucial concepts: 'Legality' and 'Integrity', embedded in his legal theory. In his early writings, Dworkin distinguishes two models of Rule of Law, the rule book model and the right model, and claims explicitly to defend the right-based conception. Jeremy Waldron in recent work proposes a different reading. He contends that Dworkin is committed to a proceduralist conception of the Rule of Law, that is, a conception "committed to a method of arguing about the exercise of public power." The present study, however, rejects Waldron's proceduralist interpretation on the grounds that Dworkin recently argues that the value of Legality arises from an asp [rational concept of law in which Integrity comes to be the most convincing value of political morality. Along these lines, this paper articulates the constitutive elements of Integrity（the interpretive element, the legitimate element, the evaluative element, and the holistic element）, and, by considering Brian Tamanaha's account of formal and substantive theories of Rule of Law, argues that Dworkin is committed to a thick and substantive conception. In summary, the central Rule of Law thesis Ronald Dworkin defends is his ethical view of Human Dignity, i.e., the insistence that each person has the same objective intrinsic value but at the same time bears moral responsibility for the pursuit of his or her own successful life.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、規則手冊與權利的法治觀
貳、Waldron 的程序論解讀
一、Waldron 的論證
（一）司法判決的可被論爭性
（二）正確答案命題的開放性
（三）法律實踐的論證性格
（四）整全法的論辯特性
二、德沃金的回應
三、程序、實質與整全性
參、合法性與整全性（一）：審視
一、合法性做為法律的理想概念
二、精確、效率與整全性
三、整全性的構成要素
（一）詮釋性要素（interpretive elements）：符合與證立
（二）正當性要素（legitimate elements）：原則社群與政治義務
（三）評價性要素（evaluative elements）：程序公平與實質正義
（四）整體性要素（holisticelements）：純粹的整全性（pureinte-grity）與價值的統合
肆、合法性與整全性（二）：反思
一、法治的程序與實質
二、形式與實質的法治理論
三、整全性與精確性
伍、結語：刺蝟的法治觀
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|