| 關 鍵 詞： |
Delegation；Mandat；管轄權移轉；管轄權恆定原則；權限委託；權限委任；委辦；管轄權外部法效力；訴願管轄機關；消極訴訟實施權 |
| 中文摘要： |
我國行政程序法第十五條參酌德奧法制，導入「管轄權移轉」機制，賦予行政機關得依法規將其權限之一部分，委任或委託其他行政機關執行之。管轄權一旦經合法移轉予另一行政機關後，原管轄機關在移轉期間內即喪失執行該行政事務之權限；取而代之，受權限移轉之行政機關則成為新的管轄機關，享有執行被移轉行政事務之權限，得以自己名義對外為法律行為。管轄權移轉乃屬管轄權恆定原則之例外，依行政程序法第十五條之規定，其合法性要件應滿足「授權法規之存在」、「移轉行為之踐行」，以及「正當行政程序之完備」三項要件，缺一不可。
管轄權移轉不僅只是行政組織法所探討之客體，對於行政作用法以及行政爭訟法更富具意義，蓋其將影響行政行為作成機關、訴願決定機關、行政訴訟被告消極訴訟實施權，以及國家賠償義務機關之認定。然而，訴願法第七條卻將受託機關所為之對外單方具體行政行為視為是「委託機關」之行政處分，體系上顯與行政程序法第十五條之設計不相契合。本文認為，我國行政程序法第十五條關於權限委任與權限委託之規定，從體系解釋以及比較法之觀點，應皆屬於具有「管轄權移轉」效果之權限授與機制，相當於德國法上之 Delegation。我國行政程序法權限委託之立法說明文詞前後扞格，不宜作為解釋其法律性質之準據，而誤認為相當於德國法上不具管轄權移轉之權限代理（Mandat）。據此，訴願法第七條乃屬不當之立法，宜予修正，以符管轄權移轉之法理。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Transfer of Competence；Principle of Permanent Authority；Assignment of Competence；Delegation；Authority of Administrative Appeal Decisions；Standing and Mootness in Administrative Litigation |
| 英文摘要： |
The 15th paragraph of our Administrative Procedure Act, which takes into consideration the law system in Germany and Austria, pre-scribes the Administration to delegate part of its Competence to another Administration. As soon as the original Administration delegates its Competence to another Administration, it forfeits its Authority and the forfeited one has now the full Authority in order to accomplish the legal act on its own behalf. The Transfer of Competence is an exception of the Principle of Permanent Authority. According to the 15th paragraph of our Administrative Procedure Act, the condition of legitimacy must have three components, namely: “the enabling act”, “the implementation of transfer” and “the complete administrative procedure”.
The Transfer of Competence is not only meaningful for Administrative Organization law, but also for Administrative Function law and Administrative Litigation Act, because it suborns the judgment of the Authority of Administrative Decisions, the Authority of Administrative【2006行政管制與行政爭訟－法學專書系列之四，2007年1月，第246頁】Appeal Decisions, the Standing and Mootness in Administrative Litigation and the Authority of State Responsibility. However the 7th Para-graph of Administrative Appeal Act is clearly inconsistent with the 15th Paragraph of the Administrative Procedure Act. According to this Article the 15th Paragraph of the Administrative Procedure Act includes the content of Transfer of Assignment of Competence. In another words, this Paragraph is same as the concept “Delegation” in German law. The reason for placing Legislation in the 15th Paragraph of Administrative Procedure Act misunderstands the Assignment of Competence as the concept “Mandat” in German law. The 7th Paragraph of Administrative Appeal Act is not suitable and should be modified.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題之提出
貳、管轄權移轉之意義與類型
一、管轄權移轉之意義
（一）管轄權
（二）管轄權移轉
二、管轄權移轉之類型
（一）德國法上之分類
（二）我國法上之分類
參、管轄權移轉之合法性要求
一、法規授權之必要性
（一）管轄權法定與恆定原則
（二）授權法規位階相當性
二、權限移轉行為
三、正當行政程序
四、小結
肆、管轄權移轉之外部法效力
一、行政處分
二、行政契約
三、行政事實行為
伍、涉及管轄權移轉之行政爭訟問題
一、管轄權移轉行為本身之可爭訟性
二、訴願管轄機關之認定
（一）撤銷訴願
（二）課予義務訴願
三、行政訴訟消極訴訟實施權
（一）消極訴訟實施權於各行政訴訟類型之判斷
（二）消極訴訟實施權欠缺之處置
四、國家賠償義務機關之認定
（一）因不法行使公權力所生之國家賠償責任
（二）因公有公共設施設置或管理有欠缺所生之國家賠償責任
陸、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|