法學論著
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
正當法律程序-美國法制之比較研究
文獻引用
編著譯者: 郭介恒
出版日期: 1998.08.01
集叢名稱: 台灣 憲法體制與法治行政-城仲模教授六秩華誕祝壽論文集 第二冊行政法總論
頁  數: 23 點閱次數: 1362
下載點數: 92 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 郭介恒
關 鍵 詞: 正當法律程序基本權違憲審查墮胎個人資料保護
中文摘要: 我國憲法中並未如英美憲法中對正當法律程序設有明文,惟由於我國憲法除第八條關於人身自由之保障外,在第十六條復設有人民請願、訴願及訴訟權之保障明文,同時憲法第二十三條則有人民自由權利之一般性限制條文,對於美國法制中慣用之正當法律程序條款,在我國法制是否仍具必要性,即不無斟酌之餘地。本文擬比較美國法制,探討正當法律程序在我國法制下之可能適用。
英文摘要: The due process of law clauses are stipulated in the Fifth and Fourteen Amendment of U.S. Constitution as the most important Constitutional principle. The due process of law has preponderance influence on the development of the American Constitution with respect to the protection of individual rights. Under Article 8, paragraph 1 of the R.O.C. Constitution, the term, procedure of law, is also stipulated. However, whether the provision is equivalent to the due process of law under American legal system or not remains unsettled controversies. The 384 Interpretation of Judicial Yuan has indicated that any measure that restricts the individual physical freedom in the field of criminal procedure or others should subject to the procedure stipulated by a legislation and it is required that the content of the legislation should be substantially due. The 384 Interpretation of Judicial Yuan is the first precedent that cited the American due process of law principle as criteria to construe the R.O.C. Constitution. Meanwhile, there is few discussion on the subject of substantial due process of American legal system in R.O.C. The following paper focus on the rules derived from the application of due process in American legal system to compare the relevant interpretations of R.O.C. Constitution in order to explore the possibility of applying the due process of law as one of the fundamental principle in the interpretation of R.O.C. Constitution. The finding of this research provides a reference for the interpretation and application of R.O.C. Constitution.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、正當法律程序之意義及源起
參、正當法律程序之實質正當
一、自然法權利理論之興起
二、自由貿易主義興起
三、美國聯邦憲法第十四修正案之公布
肆、正當法律程序之適用
一、節育法律
二、墮胎爭議
三、家屬關係
四、個人外表之限制
五、個人資料保護
六、禁止冒險
七、受管束智障者之權利
八、心智自由權
九、死亡權利
伍、正當法律程序在我國法制上之運用
一、司法院釋字第 384 號解釋
二、正當法律程序與違憲審查
三、我國憲法基本權與正當法律程序之保障
陸、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
郭介恒,正當法律程序-美國法制之比較研究,憲法體制與法治行政-城仲模教授六秩華誕祝壽論文集 第二冊行政法總論,1998年08月01日。
返回功能列