法學論著
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 詐欺罪與恐嚇取財罪-以 96 年第 15 號法律座談會為中心(Offenses of Fraud and Offenses of Extortion centered on the law symposium No. 15 of 2007)
編著譯者: 許絲捷
出版日期: 2017.06
集叢名稱: 銘傳大學 2017 追求高教卓越國際學術研討會-法學新知國際學術研討會論文集
頁  數: 16 點閱次數: 882
下載點數: 64 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 許絲捷
關 鍵 詞: 詐欺罪恐嚇取財罪處分自由財產處分法條競合
中文摘要: 若行為人謊稱綁架被害人家人,要求被害人交付贖金,被害人因相信家人遭綁,害怕家人發生不測,交付贖款。究竟該論以詐欺罪?抑或是恐嚇取財罪?這個問題,高等法院曾於民國96年進行討論並已形成結論,論以恐嚇取財罪。然而,論以恐嚇取財罪的理由為何卻未清楚闡明。本文擬以此座談會為主軸,探討詐欺罪與恐嚇取財罪之區別,並思考兩罪間與處分自由之關係。
英文關鍵詞: FraudExtortionFreedom of Dispositiondispose of propertiesGesetzeskonkurren
英文摘要: If the perpetrator lied in claiming to have kidnapped a member or members of the victim's family, asking the victim to deliver a ransom, and the victim, believing that a member of his or her family was being held hostage, and fearing that they would encounter misfortune otherwise, paid the ransom, then what precisely should we call this crime? Fraud? Or extortion? This issue was discussed by the ROC High Court in 2007, and the conclusion reached was that this constituted extortion. However, the reasons why this conclusion was reached were never clarified. This paper will attempt to use this forum as the keystone, in exploring the differences between fraud and extortion, as well as considering the relationship between the two crimes and freedom of disposition.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、96 年第 15 號法律座談會及其之前的實務意見
參、分別檢驗各罪
肆、競合處理
伍、結語
陸、參考資料
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列