| 關 鍵 詞： |
民營化；國家任務；容許性；任務批判；履行責任；擔保責任；可移轉性 |
| 中文摘要： |
財政緊縮與去管制化造成國家任務本質的更動。私營化的複雜表現形態，對於行政總論與各論修訂構成急迫挑戰。本文在於從容許性的角度探討形式與實質私營化，以作為決斷的依據。作者試圖其中建立幾項標準與限制。本質上，私營化是一種極為特殊的法律概念與。就任務私化須先經任務批判、進行組織私化時須與同等之公法組織相互參照，形式選擇自由並非自明之理。組織私化既將履行移轉於私人，能否成功端視招標程序的進行。
綜言之，私營化介於法制定與法適用之間，係變更任務主體與履行方式。基於重要性原則，立法者須就能否、在何種情況、至何等程度制定容許性規範。為避免過於干涉行政自主性，自我評估義務不失為一可行途徑。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
privatization；task review；admissibility；choice of legal form；corporatization；full and functional privatization；economic activities；tender procedure |
| 英文摘要： |
The fiscal crisis and the deregulation have caused a reduction of state activities in several areas of the public sector. But, the privatization phenomenon is much more complex and has an impact on current challenges to the structure of general and specific administrative law.
The paper examines the judicial admissibility of privatization in the formal and material regards that control decision-making. On the basis of the general part of the theory of constitutional law, it works out the basic criteria for admissibility and the limits of privatization. In its nature, privatization is an unusual, indefinite legal concept and discretion. The concept of full privatization must be critically assessed (task review) and carefully scrutinized. Any decision on corporatization should be compared with public law institutions. Also, the so-called choice of legal form is not self-evident. Functional privatization refers to delegation of state tasks to private law. Whether it will be successful depends on the delicate procedure.
Generally speaking, privatization is between rulemaking and policy making that aims to change the authority or the legal form. To observe the principles of materiality, the legislators must determine whether, under what conditions and to which degree the decision of privatization is admissible. With respect to the independence of administration, the obligation of self-evaluation is suitable.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題意識
貳、私營化決定之特性
一、關於任務與權限的決定
二、特殊的法律概念
三、特殊的方式選擇
參、容許性規範
一、私營化決定的憲法原則
二、任務規範之容許性
三、權限規範之容許性
肆、任務私化的容許性規範因素
一、「審酌情勢」條款與「任務批判」條款
二、解除任務獨占與開放競爭
三、限制國家私經濟活動
伍、組織私化的容許性規範因素
一、組織裁量權之規制
二、權限規範下的法定評估義務
陸、功能私化的容許性規範因素
一、可選擇類型
二、評估任務的可移轉性
三、評估私人的承接能力
柒、結語與展望
一、私營化的本質意義
二、法釋義學的重整
三、法典化的期待可能性
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|