法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度之研究(Study on the volume of imposing a fine by the FTC)
編著譯者: 張麗卿
出版日期: 2007.04
刊登出處: 台灣/公平交易季刊第 15 卷 第 2 期 /41-94 頁
頁  數: 45 點閱次數: 1522
下載點數: 180 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張麗卿
關 鍵 詞: 罰鍰競爭裁罰表判斷餘地獨立機關行政規則
中文摘要: 「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」施行迄今已經超過 6 年。原則上,行政法院都認同公平交易委員會裁處的罰鍰。惟晚近卻屢加質疑「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」之考量項目及適用等級,進而撤銷公平交易委員會的處分。鑑於實務趨勢之轉變,本文介紹罰鍰額度形成所根據的「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」之生成及沿革,並就各國相關立法例及國內其他機關有關裁罰之相關規定加以比較,釐清「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」的法律性質與行政機關判斷餘地間之關係。尤其,針對行政法院撤銷公平交易委員會相關案例,探討撤銷之理由,並就行政法院得否審查行政機關之裁量內容及界線,加以論述。最後,提出應廢止或大幅修正裁罰表之內容及理由,並就公平交易委員會將來裁處罰鍰額度之運作,提出若干具體建議。
英文關鍵詞: FineCompetitionthe Reference to Considerations for ImpositionAuthorized DiscretionIndependent AuthorityAdministrative Rules
英文摘要: “The Reference to Considerations for Imposition (RCI) of Fair Trade Commission (FTC)” has come into force for over six years. Generally, the administrative courts may consent to impositions made by FTC. However, the courts recently started to question the listed- and classed standards of the RCI, and then revoked the impositions frequently. Seeing the changes of the practical exercises, this article is to introduce the birth and history of the RCI, according to which the amount of a fine shall be decided, and to compare the RCI with the foreign legislations the imposition regulations of the other domestic authorities in order to make clear the relationship between the nature of the RCI and the authorized discretion. Especially, it is also to discuss cases in which the impositions made by FTC are revoked by courts and the reasoning thereof, so as to find out the boundaries to which the administrative court is allowed examining the Discretion of FTC. At last, it is to indicate how and why the RCI shall be abolished or revised to certain extend, and to put forward some suggestions concerning the future exercise of the imposition of FTC.
目  次: 一、前言
二、生成及沿革
三、立法例之比較
四、其他機關之比較
五、裁罰表之法律性質
六、案例檢討
七、結論與建議
八、後記
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列