| 關 鍵 詞： |
輔助侵權；安全港；著作權侵害；DMCA；Directive 2004/48/EC；P2P |
| 中文摘要： |
對於檔案分享軟體的開發與散布者而言，其自身如未直接從事侵害著作權行為，應否負擔責任？網路相關服務業者是否負有幫著作權人監控並排除非法下載行為的義務？本文由兩大主軸所建構，除了美國以外，並側重英、德兩國案例與相關規範之介紹，同時兼及對著作權刑事立法政策的評論；值此「後 Grokster 時代」，針對 P2P 內蘊的著作權保護價值衝突，亦扼要表示看法。另一主軸則為我國著作權法於 2007 年 6 月 14 日修正所增加的第 87 條第 1 項第 7 款與同條第 2 項規定，依本文，，其抽象危險構成要件的立法架構與推定責任摸式，對照美國DMCA安全港之規定，應屬未妥，允宜再做修正。從市場經濟來說，美國的Sony案是個啓示：與其汲汲營營維護著作權，不如改變商業經營模式。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Contributoiy infringement；DMCA；safe harbors；Directive 2004/48/BQ P2P；copyright infringement |
| 英文摘要： |
Should those who develop and distribute file sharing software bear responsibility for copyright infringement, even if they do not directly engage in such behavior? Do online service providers have the duty to help copyright holders monitor and curb illegal downloading? This paper explains legislation and legal decisions concerning P2P transmission in European and the US，and also provides an in-depth discussion of the Sony, Napster, and Grokster cases. The paper starts with a brief explanation of the concept of copyright infringement responsibility. It then introduces the American DMCA's disclaimer for online service providers (OSPs) and the EU's Information Society Directive (Directive 2001/29/EEC) and Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC, and summarizes views concerning the conflict of values engendered by copyright protection involving P2P transmission in the "post- Grokster age." Another aspect explored in the paper concerns issues involviag criminal law arising from copyright protection cases in Taiwan. Finally, the paper presents personal views concerning whether Taiwan should adopt disclaimers and a compensation system. From the point of view of the market economy, America's Sony case is highly enlightening: It illustrates' that vigorously protecting copyrights is not as good as changing commercial business models so as to provide consumers with legal，inexpensive, and convenient online download chamiels that also leave less room for piracy and sharply curtail copyright infringement.
|
| 目 次： |
一、背景説明
二、美國的發展
（一）輔助侵權責任與DMCA
（二）輔助侵權着任輿著作輕侵害
（三）DMCA 的免責限制－安全港（safe harbors）
（四）從 Sony 到 Grokster
三、歐洲的立場
（一）資訊社會指令的濫觴
（二）執行指令的一致貫徹
（三）習慣法國家的檔案分享媒介責任
（四）德國關於網路服務業者的責任規範
四、P2P 架構的規範對應手段
五、失衡的風險力法－代結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|