| 關 鍵 詞： |
一般給付訴訟；撤銷訴訟；課予義務訴訟；行政契約；行政處分 |
| 中文摘要： |
行政訴訟法上一般給付訴訟與其他之行政訴訟種類之關聯，儘管行政訴訟法第 8 條定有明文，司法院版之行政訴訟法修正草案亦予以增修。惟近年來行政法院實務對此一議題，累積了不少重要裁判，本文旨在分析其中對於一般給付訴訟與其他行政訴訟種類關聯之見解，並對若干值得商榷之處提出探討。按一般給付訴訟定位之混淆，主要係因為實務上對於在行政契約中關係中，並不妨礙行政機關基於法令作成行政處分，從而進一步限縮因行政契約關係所生之爭議提起一般給付訴訟的範圍，此一現象恐非在行政訴訟法修正的立法政策上所能解決，主要是涉及法理之解釋問題。本文認為除行政契約的基礎法律關係，諸如成立、終止或解除，皆不應以行政處分的方式形成之外，行政契約關係中，行政機關基於法令作成行政處分之範圍，應以裁罰性行政處分及行使公法上返還請求權為限。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
administration litigation of performance；revoke and command；administrative contracts；administrative disposition |
| 英文摘要： |
The administration litigation the top of the method pays litigation generally with other of the connection of the administration litigation category, though the administration litigation Act of Article 8 certainly have clear statement, the administration litigation method of the Judicial Yuan version revises drafted plan to also increase to fix. However in recent years actual situation in the administration court to this subject, accumulated a few importance assize, this text aim at analytical among them for general benefit litigation and the other administration litigation category connection of views, and to some worthy of business put forward a study. Press general benefit litigation fixed position it confuse, mainly is because the top of the actual situation for relate to in the administration contract in, don’t hinder the administration organization to make disciplinary sanction according to the ordinance, limit thus and further because of administration contract relation get of the controversy bring up to pay generally litigation of scope, this phenomenon revises in the administration litigation method perhaps and not of the top of the lawmaking policy can resolve, mainly is involve the hermeneutic problem of the legal theory.This text thinks in addition to the foundation law of the administration contract relates to such as establish, terminating or relieving, all shouldn’t become an outside by disciplinary sanction, administration the contractual relation is medium, the administration organization makes the scope of the disciplinary sanction according to the ordinance, should take cutting to punish sex disciplinary sanction and exercising public laws to return to still request power up as to limit.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、一般給付訴訟與其他行政訴訟種類之關聯之實務見解
一、得以請求作成行政處分之方式實現公法上給付請求權者，不得提起一般給付訴訟
二、得直接提起一般給付訴訟者，應限於請求金額已獲准許可或已保證確定之金錢支付或返還
三、行政機關之否准給付處分與一般給付訴訟
四、行政機關得以作成行政處分達其行政目的者，不得提起一般給付訴訟
五、限縮因行政契約關係所生之爭議提起一般給付訴訟的範圍
1. 勞工保險事件
2. 公教人員保險事件
3. 教師聘約事件
4. 全民健康保險特約醫事服務機構合約事件
參、釐清一般給付訴訟與其他行政訴訟種類應有之界限
一、合理限縮行政契約關係中行政機關基於法令作成行政處分的範圍
1. 行政契約的基礎法律關係，諸如成立、終止或解除，皆不應以行政處分的方式形成之
2. 行政契約關係中，行政機關基於法令作成行政處分之範圍，應以裁罰性行政處分及行使公法上返還請求權為限
二、行政契約之外的公法上給付請求權，得直接提起一般給付訴訟的範圍有限
三、一般給付訴訟與撤銷訴訟之關聯
四、一般給付訴訟與其他行政訴訟種類關聯之「補充性」問題
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|