| 關 鍵 詞： |
商標刑法；釋字第 594 號解釋；商標侵害；混淆誤認之虞；構成要件明確性 |
| 中文摘要： |
本文主要談的是商標權保護的刑事立法政策問題。仿冒品針對商標符號的經濟意義與價值，於生產、消費中予以盜用，從法益保護的必要性觀察，是否有別於專利法而難以除罪化的理由，頗值探究；2003 年商標法全面修正後，商標法第 81 條關於刑罰規定的內容有無可議之處，亦值追索。依本文意見，商標刑法所欲保護的法益，應係商標的資訊傳輸功能，復藉由實務的運作觀察，可發現商標刑法規定在解釋論上的疑難，似乎不在於規範性構成要件要素的使用所造成的構成要件明確性或錯誤問題，而是立法者藉由遵守 TRIPs 國際條約、維護市場競爭秩序與消費者權益的包裝，在公平交易法與普通刑法之外，重複使用刑罰，並指望以其威嚇功能，作為保護智財權人財產的手段思考。本文認為，我國透過商標刑法而非民事侵權責任或公平交易法以保護此一「傳遞資訊的工具」，是不對題的解決方案，商標法第 81 條宜予刪除。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Trademark Criminal Law；J.Y.Interpretation No. 594；Trademark infringement；likely to be confused or mistaken；definitude of constituent element |
| 英文摘要： |
This text purports to give a discussion on the issues about criminal legislation policy for the protection of trademark rights. As the counterfeit goods have usurped the genuine goods in production and consumption in terms of economic meaning and value of trademark, it will be a worthy exploration if it poses reasons of being hardly to be decriminalized from the necessary observation of the protection of legal interests with its distinguishability from patent law; if Article 81 of Trademark Act concerning the content of regulations governing penalty is with controversy is also worthy of probe in the wake of amendment for Trademark Act in 2003. Based on the opinions in this text, the legal interests served as the target under the protection by trademark of criminal law signifies the transmission function of information of trademark as the observation into practical operation will lead us to a finding that the difficulty of trademark of criminal law stipulations on explanatory aspect seems not lie in the explicit or erroneous issues of constituent elements caused by the use of normative constituent elements but in legislators, repeated use of criminal law beyond Fair Trade Law and (general) Criminal Law in the hopes of achieving the intimidating function to be served as a way to protect the property of ones with intellectual property rights by means of the cover of an adherence to TRIPs, assertion of market competition order and consumer’s rights. This text will entertain the view that giving a protection of the "tools to transmit information" through trademark criminal law rather than civil liability or Fair Trade Law will be an impertinent solution, and Article 81 of Trademark Act should be abolished.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、商標權的基本概念
一、商標的經濟意義及功能
二、商標的識別性與保護方式
參、商標侵害與刑法的對應手段
一、美、德立法例
二、我國對商標使用權之刑罰保護
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|