| 關 鍵 詞： |
侵害智慧財產；證據保全；強制處分；營業秘密；秘密保持 |
| 中文摘要： |
我國自 2008 年 7 月 1 日起成立智慧財產法院，並實施智慧財產訴訟新制，開啟保護智慧財產之新紀元。智慧財產法院就智慧財產案件有優先管轄權，是智慧財產訴訟新制之架構下，智慧財產保全事件主要由智慧財產法院審理。準此，智慧財產民事事件，其無論起訴前或起訴後之證據保全均應向智慧財產法院提出聲請，使智慧財產侵權之證據保全與本案訴訟集中由智慧財產法院審理，避免保全程序與本案訴訟程序繫屬於不同法院，導致法律見解分歧之爭議。就智慧財產侵害之民事事件以觀，保全證據為證明侵權行為及請求損害賠償之重大關鍵，其具有預防證據滅失、礙難使用或知悉證據狀態，達成預防訴訟及幫助法院發現真實等功能。因保全證據程序非直接以實體法上請求權之保全為對象，是法院無庸判斷實體法上之主張有無理由、勝訴可能性、應證事實與本案請求之關聯性、該證據對於本案證據之重要性或證明之必要性。法院審理智慧財產民事證據保全，為兼顧當事人之權益，應考量當事人利益、訴訟權利、營業秘密之保護及有其無其他可期待方法取得證據資料等因素，以認定有無保全證據之必要性。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
IP rights infringement；preservation of evidence；enforceable order；trade secrets；protective orders |
| 英文摘要： |
In order to protect intellectual property rights, properly handle intellectual property cases, and further the nation’s technological and economic development, therefore enact Intellectual Property Court Organization Act and Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act. The civil remedies of the infringement can be divided into pre-event and post-event relief actions. Pre-event action is fulfilled with security implementation and evidence security. Preservation of evidence is the most important in intellectual property cases. On the one hand, it can avoid loss of evidence or difficulty to use it. On the other hand, it is to ensure the existing states of affairs by observation and examination of objects, so that they can choose a better dispute resolving route. To get the whole picture of cases more efficiently, Intellectual Property Court Organization Act provide court’s order for preservation of evidence enforcing power. The Court may impose a penalty upon a holder of document or object to inspection that refuses to submit document or object to court, and the court may order such holder be subject to enforcement. It is necessary to maintain fair competition and to avoid evidence preservation mechanism being abused. So an application for preservation of evidence is to be granted, should depend on results of weighing between the defendant’s trade secrets and the gravity of IP rights infringement.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、我國法制
參、美國之事證開示制度
肆、TRIPs 協定之證據調查
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|