| 關 鍵 詞： |
環境影響評估法；不確定法律概念；保護規範理論；公權利；訴訟權能；公民訴訟；中科三期 |
| 中文摘要： |
本文旨在回顧我國環境影響評估法相關判決。最高行政法院新近四則判決不管在內容及結構上均具有高度類似性，而且各項論點具有高度說服力，顯見最高行政法院對於環評案件的見解日趨穩定成熟，值得高度肯定。不過就保護規範理論、公權利以及訴訟權能之關係部分，包括公民訴訟在內，實務見解仍然有許多值得批評及改進之處，本文乃針對各項問題仔細加以探討。文末並略述中科三期之聲請停止執行案以及撤銷環評結論定瓛後之後續發展以作為未來之展望。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Environmental Impact Assessment；Indefinite Legal Concept；Theory of Protection Norms；Public Law Right, Standing；Citizen Suit；the Central Taiwan Science Park Ⅲ |
| 英文摘要： |
This article aims to review the judgments regarding Environmental Impact Assessment Law in Taiwan. The Supreme Administrative Court recently made four judgments. Their content and structure are highly similar, and the arguments of them are very persuasive. It shows that the opinions of Supreme Administrative Court on cases of Environmental Impact Assessment are reaching stability and maturity. It deserves acclaim. However, the opinions of some other judgments about the relationship between the theory of protection norms, the public law right and the standing, including citizen suit as well, are still much to be criticized and improved. This article studies these issues in detail. Finally this article describes briefly the case of applying for stopping implementation of the Central Taiwan Science Park III, as well as the following progress after rescinding the decision of its environmental impact assessment to conviction affirmed.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、肯定篇－新近四則最高行政法院判決探討
一、關於判斷餘地的審查
二、第二階段始為真正的環評程序
三、開發行為對環境有重大影響「之虞」者，即應繼續進行第二階段環評
參、質疑篇－保護規範理論、公權利與訴訟權能
一、損害「現實」之權利或法律上利益？
（一）違反判決先例拘束力的正當基礎
（二）受保護規範保護之特定人享有公法上的權利，無須舉證另有其他現實之權利或法律上利益受損
二、環評法保護的人的範圍？
（一）環評法第八條的保護對象
（二）環評法第五條的保護對象
三、公民訴訟中所謂之「受害人民」－兼評台北高等行政法院九十八年度訴字第五○四號判決
肆、未來發展評估與展望篇
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|