法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
從凱爾生理論談歐洲共同體法規範秩序(The Hierarchy of Norms in the European Community: A Kelsenian Perspective)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 許耀明
出版日期: 2006.09
刊登出處: 台灣/財產法暨經濟法第 7 期/107-136 頁
頁  數: 19 點閱次數: 1075
下載點數: 76 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 許耀明
關 鍵 詞: Hans Kelsen純粹法學法規範體系位階秩序歐體法
中文摘要: 本文從凱爾生的純粹法學出發,依次論述其法律體系觀、國際法規範位階秩序觀,以求釐清歐體法規範體系的秩序建立可能。藉由對於歐體實際發展的建構方式、法規範位階秩序,以及歐體法院判例跟德國聯邦憲法法院判例之分析,本文嘗試從凱爾生之角度,釐清歐體與各成員國間不同法規範體系間的相互關係。本文認為,以凱爾生國際法國內法一元論之理論,可以架構出歐體法國內法一元論或歐體法國內法多元論之主張,兩者在邏輯上皆可證成,惟迄今歐體之發展,應較偏向多元論之方式。
英文關鍵詞: Hans KelsenPure Theory of LawSystem of NormsHierarchy of NormsEuropean Community Law
英文摘要: Analyzing the concept of legal system and the hierarchy of international legal order in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law, this article tries to illuminate the possibility to construct a hierarchy of norms in European Community. By illustrating the actual constructing method of European Community and its legal order/ hierarchy, and by analyzing the jurisprudences of European Court of Justice and of German Federal Constitutional Court, this article urges to clarify the relationship between the legal order of European Community and the ones of its Members states. In conclusion, this article identifies that according to the Kelsen’s Monism that explains the relationship between the national legal orders and international one, we could construct the European legal order, either in a Monist way or a Pluralist one. Both are justifiable logically. But, based on the actual development of European Community, this article concludes that a Pluralist way demonstrates a more accurate thesis.
目  次: 前言
壹、凱爾生之法律體系觀與國際法規範位階秩序
一、凱爾生之法律體系觀
二、國際法規範位階秩序
貳、從凱爾生理論看歐體法規範架構原則
一、歐體法規範體系的建構方式與法規範位階秩序
二、從凱爾生理論看歐體法規範位階秩序
結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
許耀明,從凱爾生理論談歐洲共同體法規範秩序,財產法暨經濟法,第 7 期,107-136 頁,2006年09月。
返回功能列