| 關 鍵 詞： |
人權公約；公民與政治權利國際公約；國際法的效力；單方面行為 |
| 中文摘要： |
我國立法院於二○○九年三月三十一日審議通過公民與政治權利國際公約，總統於二○○九年五月十四日簽署批准書，而兩公約施行法則於二○○九年十二月十日實施。隨著公民與政治權利國際公約與我國關係的轉變，待處理的問題有二：（1）公民與政治權利國際公約經我國國內批准後（未完成國際法上的批准程序）及施行法施行後，在我國國內法上的效力分別為何？（2）在公民與政治權利國際公約經我國國內批准前、批准後及施行法施行後，我國法院在刑事裁判中如何適用公民與政治權利國際公約？是否妥當？在從理論面探討公民與政治權利國際公約在我國國內法上的效力後，本文對最高法院及高等法院刑事裁判中論及公民與政治權利國際公約的 20 個案件進行實證分析研究，並就實證研究發現的缺失，提出解決之道。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Human Rights；International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights；Binding Effect of International Law；An Unilateral Act |
| 英文摘要： |
In Taiwan, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) was ratified on May 14, 2009, and the Act to Implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights entered into force on December 10, 2009. Recently, questions have been raised: (1) What kind of binding effects does the Covenant have on Taiwan, after ratifying it or the Act to implement it entering into force? (2) How had courts applied the Covenant in criminal cases? In order to answer those questions, empirical materials of twenty criminal cases from Supreme Court and Taiwan High Courts is under study. Based on the findings of empirical study, this article argues that courts need to apply the Covenant correctly according to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and general comments of the Human Rights Committee, after the Act to Implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights entered into force.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題的提出
貳、公民與政治權利國際公約的實踐、架構及對我國的效力
參、我國最高法院及高等法院刑事裁判的實證硏究
肆、我國法院如何更細緻地適用公民與政治權利國際公約
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|