法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
第三人撤銷訴訟當事人適格及其他起訴問題之研究(STUDIES ON STANDING OF PLAINTIFF AND OTHER DISPUTES OF PROSECUTION OF THE THIRD-PARTY OPPOSITION PROCEEDING)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 林家慶徐崧博
出版日期: 2011.08
刊登出處: 台灣/軍法專刊第 57 卷 第 4 期/64-77 頁
頁  數: 14 點閱次數: 2454
下載點數: 56 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 軍法專刊社 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 第三人撤銷訴訟有法律上利害關係既判力應循其他法定程序請求救濟判決當事人適格
中文摘要: 2003 年我國民事訴訟法增訂「第三人撤銷訴訟程序」(民事訴訟法第 507 條之 1  至第 507  條之 5),此一全新的制度乃我國所繼受之德國法所全無,而究竟應否於我國民事訴訟法中增訂此一第三人撤銷之訴,在立法之初即備受爭議,且此一制度的定位、構成要件之解釋更是經過討論熱烈。本文擬就近年來之實務判決,分析第三人撤銷之訴在法律解釋上與實務運作間之異同,並嘗試提出解釋論上之看法,俾供參考。
英文關鍵詞: Third-Party Opposition Proceedinglegally interestedbinding forceshould seek remedies through other legal proceedingsjudgmentstanding of plaintiff
英文摘要: In 2003, the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure was revised, and augmented with section V-I Third-Party Opposition Proceeding. (Code of Civil Procedure article 507-1 to article 507-5) However, this proceeding of Third-Party Opposition has not been used in the German Civil Procedure Rules which Taiwanese Code largely derived from. Therefore, the characteristic of this proceeding, the criteria of proceeding, and also the interpretation of the articles governing this proceeding have been widely debated ever since the legislation stage. This article would focus upon analyzing judicial decisions of the court, and further make comparison between the actual manipulations of the Third-party Opposition Proceeding by the court and the logical interpretation of the regulation. Lastly, by using these analyses, this article would also bring out suggestions about how to interpret and manipulate this regulation, and try to contribute to the construction of this newly formed Civil Procedure proceeding.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、第三人撤銷訴訟制度介紹及實務運作情形
參、第三人撤銷訴訟當事人適格之研究
一、「有法律上利害關係之第三人」內涵之爭議
二、「應循其他法定程序請求救濟者」內涵之爭議
三、選定人能否提起之爭議
肆、第三人撤銷訴訟起訴之其他爭議
一、判決於本編增訂前已確定者能否提起本訴?
二、對已確定之「裁定」能否提起本訴?
三、本訴訴訟標的價額如何核定?
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
林家慶、徐崧博,第三人撤銷訴訟當事人適格及其他起訴問題之研究,軍法專刊,第57卷第4期,64-77頁,2011年08月。
返回功能列