| 關 鍵 詞： |
被害人供述；補強證據；性侵害；電車痴漢；微物證據 |
| 中文摘要： |
關於刑事案件被害人供述的補強證據，目前法條並無規定，但在某些案件，如性侵害的案件，由於事後採集物證等的不易，因此往往可能在審判時，僅以被害人的供述為主要，甚至是唯一證據，此正當性恐成疑問。本文即欲以日本近幾年來，常出現的電車痴漢的事例為出發，來檢討性侵害案件中，關於被害人供述補強證據的必要性，並依據此檢討，來與我國現行法的規定為相互輝映，以為他山之石的借鏡。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
the victim’s testimony；the reinforcement evidence；the sexual harassment；stalker of the metro；trace evidence |
| 英文摘要： |
There is no regulation about the victim’s confession as the reinforcement evidence in the criminal case. However, in certain cases, such as the cases related to sexual harassment, it is not easy to gather the material evidences afterward. Therefore, the judge may take the victim's confession as the main or even the only one evidence. Such being the case, the validity would be questioned. This article namely wants to take the stalker of the metro in Japan recently as the instance in order to survey if there is the necessity about the validity of victim’s confession as the reinforcement evidence in the sexual harassment cases. Then, this article tries to examine if there is the space for further improvement in the related laws and regulations in our country.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、日本電車痴漢案例檢討
一、電車痴漢的意義
二、典型的電車痴漢事件
三、刑事司法的對待及其問題
四、被害人供述的疑問及補強證據的必要性
參、我國法關於被害人供述的規範現況及其檢討
一、目前的規範現狀
二、實務見解－以94年臺上字第3326號判決為說明
三、被害人供述的補強證據必要性
四、未來的方向
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|