法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 論憲法上之最低生存保障請求權(On the Constitutional Right to Minimum Subsistence Guarantee)
編著譯者: 張桐銳
出版日期: 2011.10
刊登出處: 台灣/政大法學評論第 123 期 /121-191 頁
頁  數: 46 點閱次數: 2026
下載點數: 184 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張桐銳
關 鍵 詞: 社會救助最低生存保障最低生活費社會基本權生存權補充原則
中文摘要: 社會救助可說是人民憲法上最低生存保障請求權之具體化。本文以人民最低生存保障請求權為研究對象,分析其憲法基礎與規範內容。在憲法基礎上,本文主張,如果制憲者有意賦予人民憲法上請求權,而明文規定社會基本權,其意志應受尊重。至於因肯定人民享有憲法上給付請求權,所引起與民主國原則衝突之疑慮,本文認為可透過憲法之和諧解釋解決。結論是,以生存權為依據所推導出之最低生存保障請求權,如同其他社會基本權,得作為違憲審查之基準以及個案中法官解釋法律與補充法律漏洞之指導原則,並且在最低生存保障連透過漏洞補充都無法獲得實現時,直接作為請求權基礎。
在規範內容上,本文於現行社會救助制度之脈絡中,檢討最低生存保障請求權之規範內容。本文主張,人民最低生存需求之滿足以自我負責為原則,故其對於國家之最低生存保障請求權以其無力維持生計為要件;且國家與家庭在人民最低生存需求之滿足上,家庭負擔履行責任,惟國家應承擔擔保責任,於家庭無力承擔其履行責任時,國家即應提供給付。在最低生存需求之認定上,社會救助法以每人平均消費支出之 60% 來擬定「最低生活費」尚稱合理,惟最低生活費僅用以界定「低收入戶」,而非決定生活扶助金之額度,則非妥當。最後,對於社會救助法第十六條所規定之特殊項目救助與服務,人民是否有給付請求權,端視其是否屬於最低生存需求而定。
英文關鍵詞: Social AssistanceMinimum Subsistence GuaranteeMinimum Cost of LivingFundamental Social RightsRight to SubsistencePrinciple of Subsidiarity
英文摘要: Social assistance is the actualization of the right of claim for minimum subsistence guarantee as stated in the Constitution. The purpose of this research is to analyze the foundation and contents of the Constitution regarding people’s right of claim for minimum subsistence guarantee. In terms of the foundation of the Constitution, this research advocated that the lawmakers’ will should be respected in the attempt to give the right of claim to people, by stipulating fundamental social rights. As for any contradiction to the fundamental principle of a democratic state, which might result from affirming people’s payment claim, this research suggests that the issue could be resolved through an interpretation of the Constitution. It is concluded that the right of claim for minimum subsistence guarantee based on the right to subsistence, just like other fundamental social rights, may be used as the golden rule when investigating if the Constitution was violated, and when judges interpreted the law as well as providing a supplement to counter the loophole in law; the result could serve as the basis for the right of claim when minimum subsistence guarantee could not be obtained, even after the loophole in law has been supplemented.
In terms of the contents of the Constitution, this research reviewed the norm regarding the right of claim for minimum subsistence guarantee, and concluded that meeting people’s requirement of minimum subsistence should be based on self-responsibility. Consequently, failing to make a living was a prerequisite to the right of claim for minimum subsistence guarantee. For meeting people’s requirement of minimum subsistence, Family should assume the fulfilling responsibility and the Nation should assume the assurance responsibility. When Family fails to fulfill its responsibility, the Nation should pay. As for the “minimum cost of living”, it is reasonable for the Social Assistance Law to compute it as 60% of the per capita nonproductive expenditure. However, the “minimum cost of living” was only used to define the “low-income family” and not the amount of living subsidy, which seemed inappropriate. Lastly, people’s right of claim for the special assistance and services stated in Article 16 of the Social Assistance Law depends on whether special assistance and service are among the requirements for minimum subsistence.
目  次: 壹、序論
一、出發點:臺北高等行政法院九十七年度簡字第五四○號判決
二、問題之提出與研究路徑
貳、最低生存保障請求權之憲法基礎
一、「社會基本權」之用語與概念
(一)「社會基本權」與「社會權」
(二)「社會基本權」與「基本國策」條款
(三)「社會基本權」與基本權之給付請求權功能
二、社會基本權作為憲法上之給付請求權
(一)學說見解概觀
(二)本文見解
三、憲法上之最低生存保障請求權
參、最低生存保障請求權之規範內容
一、最低生存保障與自我負責
二、「家庭」與最低生存需求之滿足
三、「最低生存需求」之認定
(一)生活扶助金
(二)特殊項目救助及服務
肆、臺北高等行政法院九十七年度簡字第五四○號判決簡評
一、租金補助請求權
(一)租金補助請求權之規範基礎
(二)租金補助請求權之憲法關聯性
二、「住宅補貼作業規定」作為租金補助請求權之要件規定?
三、建物用途登記含有住宅或住字樣作為租金補助請求權之法律要件?
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列