法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 政策中止促參程序之法律爭議─評台北高行 95 年訴字第 2710 號判決及最高行 98 年判字第 635 號判決(The political discontinued of Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects — The 2710th decision in Taipei High Administrative Court of 95years and the 635th decision Supreme Administrative Court of 98 years)
編著譯者: 林明鏘
出版日期: 2013.07
刊登出處: 台灣/東吳法律學報第 25 卷 第 1 期 /49-74 頁
頁  數: 25 點閱次數: 2569
下載點數: 100 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 東吳大學 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 促參程序中止行政契約公法上不當得利促參投資契約誠信原則政策中止損失補償請求權不作為國賠責任
中文摘要: 促參案件因政策更迭致半途而廢者,雖不眾多,但並非罕見,我國現行促參法及行政程序法上對此問題,並未有完備周詳之規定,因此,本論文乃針對台北高行 95 年訴字第 2710 號判決及最高行 98 年判字第 635  號判決所涉及之板新汙水下道促參案,國內有關政策中止之首件判決,加以整理分析、剖析其在行政契約法上涉及之七大契約法理問題,包含議約完成後民間機構之法律地位,主辦機關之猶豫期間,促參投資契約之定性,國賠法第 2  條第 2  項之適用餘地,行政程序法第 146  條第 2  項,公法上不當得利及政策中止之定性問題,最後提出 10 點具體結論,作為未來立法修法及司法裁判之參考。
英文關鍵詞: The discontinued procedure of Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure ProjectsAdministrative ContractUnjust enrichment shall apply mutatis mutandis in the public lawPromotion of Private Participation on Infrastructure Project ContractGood faithThe character of the discontinued policythe discontinued policyCompensationNegative crime for the authority liable for compensation
英文摘要: Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects because the policy to gave up halfway, by no means rare, but “Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects”and the “Administrative Procedure Act”in our country to this question, which have some uncompleted stipulations, therefore, this paper focus on the 2710th decision in Taipei High Administrative Court of 95 years and the 635th decision Supreme Administrative Court of 98 years to involve the case about the sewer in Banciao, which analyzes it to involve seven big contract legal principles, includes the legal status of the folk organization after the contract completes, sponsor institution's hesitation period, Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Project contract's character, State Compensation Law article 2 2nd item is suitable or not, Administrative Procedure Act article 146 2nd item, unjust enrichment shall apply mutatis mutandis in the public law, and the character of the discontinued policy, finally proposed 10 the conclusions, take the legislation and the judicial reference.

目  次: 壹、前言
貳、板新汙水下水道促參案
一、事實
二、主要爭點與行政法院裁判見解摘要
(一)申請保證金 5000 萬元之返還
(二)賠償民間機構備標費用 2633 萬元
參、板新促參案涉及之行政契約法理
一、議約完成之法律定性及該民間機構之法律地位
二、議約完成後主辦機關得享有多久之猶豫期間?
三、促參投資契約之定性
四、促參程序中止進行是否有國賠法第 2 條適用餘地?
五、誠信原則及行政程序法第 146 條第 2 項得否作為損失補償依據?
六、準用民法 179 條不當得利規定之問題
七、政策中止之法律定性問題
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列