法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 少數股東之股東會召集權研究(A Study on Calling Right of A Special Meeting of Shareholders by Minority Shareholders)
編著譯者: 姚志明
出版日期: 2013.06
刊登出處: 台灣/中原財經法學第 30 期 /1-42 頁
頁  數: 42 點閱次數: 2034
下載點數: 168 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 姚志明
關 鍵 詞: 少數股東權召集股東會權利濫用
中文摘要: 我國公司法第一七三條第一項賦予少數股東有請求董事會召集股東會之權利。然而,少數股東請求召開股東臨時會時,董事會對於少數股東之請求有無裁量權?此外,公司法第一七三條第二項之規定,前項請求提出後十五日內,董事會不為召集之通知時,股東得報經主管機關許可,自行召集。此時,主管機關,應扮演之角色究竟為何?上述問題之關鍵,乃在於少數股東權之真正內涵應如何闡釋。亦即公司法第一七三條就少數股東權保護之目的,尚有待釐清。由於國內文獻對於此課題論述者並不多,本文便以德國類似之規定(股份法第 122 條)之立法例作為詮釋之參考,針對上述之問題加以檢討分析,盼能釐清我國公司法第一七三條所應具有之真正意義。
英文關鍵詞: minority shareholdersto call a special meeting of shareholdersabuse of right
英文摘要: Article 173, Paragraph 1 of the Taiwan Company Act provides that minority shareholders may request the board of directors to call a special meeting of the shareholders. Does the board of directors have any discretionary power to decide that a special meeting of shareholders should be called? If the board of directors fails to give notice for convening a special meeting of shareholders within 15 days after the filing of the request, the proposing shareholder may, after obtaining an approval from the competent authority, convene a special meeting of shareholders on their own (Article 173, Paragraph 2 of the Taiwan Company Act). Which party’s decision, the board's or minority shareholders, is authoritative in such cases? When answering the above question, it is important to attend to the meaning of the rights of the minority shareholders. It is necessary to clarify the legislative purposes of Article 173, Paragraph 2 of the Taiwan Company Act. Because the above question is novel in Taiwan, the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) is used as important reference material for the analysis in this paper. I expect that the true implication of Article 173, Paragraph 1 of the Taiwan's Company Act could be found.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、股份有限公司少數股東召集股東會請求權
一、少數股東召集股東會請求權之性質
二、少數股東召集股東會請求權之法律基礎
三、評析
參、股份有限公司少數股東自行召集股東會之許可
一、我國公司法第一七三條第二項-主管機關許可裁量權之界限
二、德國股份法第 122 條第 3 項-法院許可裁量權之界限
三、評析
肆、問題延伸-公開收購人之股東會召集請求權與自行召集之許可
一、請求權要件之簡化-持股期限要求之免除,乃為避免妨礙移轉經營權之時機
二、立法史之探討
三、評析
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
    返回功能列