| 關 鍵 詞： |
少數股東；股東權；股東會；股東會召集請求權 |
| 中文摘要： |
由於我國公司法第 173 條第 l 項及第 4 項分別設有股東之股東會召集請求權及股東會自行召集權，其規範模式在形式上似與美國之立法例相近，但因股東行使股東會自行召集權時，必須具備「董事因股份轉讓或其他理由，致董事會不為召集或不能召集」之前提要件，實質上仍與美國各州所採納之股東會自行召集權，有所差異。此外，我國公司法第 173 條第 l 項及第 2 項所規定之股東會召集請求權，在規範模式上雖與美國「模範商業公司法」第 7.02 條第（a）項第（2）款及日本「會社法」第 297 條第 l 項之內容相當相近，但對於股東聲請許可自行召集股東會之事件，美國及日本之立法例皆規定應由司法審查，而我國則規定由主管機關（經濟部）負責審查。本文擬從美國及日本之立法例及實務案例出發，整理分析股東召集股束會之事由及規範模式，再檢討我國公司法第 173 條之解釋及適用爭議，期能強化股東權之保障，並釐清主管機關於審查股東申請許可自行召集股東會事件時所應扮演之角色。最後，則提出本文之簡要結論。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Minority Shareholders；Shareholders’ Rights；Shareholders’ Meetings；Right to Call for Shareholders’ Meeting |
| 英文摘要： |
Under the Taiwanese Company Act, the paragraph 1 and paragraph 4 of Article 173 endue minority shareholders the right to call for shareholders' meeting. In form, that is similar to the regulation model in the United States. However, If shareholders desire to exercise the right of calling for shareholders' meeting, the following requirements should be satisfied: “when the board of directors fails or cannot convene a shareholders’ meeting on account of share transfer or any other causes.” Therefore, there is still some difference with the regulation model of in the United States. Noteworthy, even though the right to call for shareholders’ meeting stipulated in Article 173 of Taiwanese Company Act is quite similar to Section 7.02(a)(2) of the Model Business Corporation Act in United States and Article 297 (1) of Japanese Companies Act, but for the shareholders' application to call for shareholders' meeting, it should be approved by the court in the United States and Japan, instead of the competent authority (Ministry of Economic Affairs) is responsible for the approval in Taiwan. Part II of this paper aims to analyze the events and regulation models of the shareholders calling for shareholders' meeting by the regulation and judicial cases in the United States and Japan. Furthermore, Part III & IV will review the explanatory issues and applicable disputes regarding with Article 173 of the Company Act, in order to strengthen the protection of shareholders' rights. In addition, this paper will clarify the role that the competent authority should play for the application cases of calling for a shareholders’ meeting. Finally, this paper will provide brief conclusion.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、楔子
貳、股東召集股東會之事由及規範模式
一、美國法
二、日本法
三、我國法
參、我國公司法第 173 條第 1 項及第 2 項之適用爭議
一、股東之資格
二、提議事項及理由
三、主管機關之審查及界限
肆、我國公司法第 173 條第 4 項之適用爭議
一、股東之資格
二、董事會不為召集或不能召集之事由
三、主管機關之審查事項
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|