法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
勞工「責任制」工作合理性之探討(A Study on the Reasonableness of the System of Job Responsibility)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 陳旻沂
出版日期: 2013.04
刊登出處: 台灣/國立中正大學法學集刊第 39 期/1-24 頁
頁  數: 24 點閱次數: 1360
下載點數: 96 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 中正大學法律學系 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 責任制工作時間延長工作時間例假休假女性夜間工作
中文摘要: 工作時間和工資如何計算,乃係勞雇雙方約定勞動契約時,最重要的勞動條件。而有些行業有其特殊之需求,若以一般對於工作時間和工資的約定模式,較無法配合其特殊需求,因此「責任制」的工作形態便應運而生。但勞工畢竟不是機器,不僅需要休息,而且也需要家庭及社會生活,因此若放任「責任制」的工作形態自由發展,甚至被濫用,勢必影響勞工的健康及所得,甚至因此造成身心不堪負荷而衍生自殺或過勞死等極端悲劇。因此如何尋求其間之平衡,乃成為值得探討之課題。
本文除檢討勞動基準法第八十四條之一規定之各項要件外,並從「是否應存在責任制」、「責任制之適用範圍」及「排除勞動基準法部分規定適用」等各角度檢討其合理性,最後則提出修法之建議,以期能解決勞雇雙方之爭議。
英文關鍵詞: System of Job ResponsibilityWorking TimeOvertime WorkRegular Days offNational HolidaysFemale Workers’ Night Work
英文摘要: How to calculate working time and wage is the most important labor condition to be stated on a labor agreement signed between an employer and an employee. Some industries have their specific requirements, which cannot be met if the working time and wage are fixed in a generally agreed way. Therefore, the working style under “system of job responsibility” appears along with the trend. However, laborers are somehow not machines. They not only need to rest, but also need to have family and social lives. Therefore, if the working style under “system of job responsibility” is freely and randomly developed, or even abused by employers, the health and income of labor must be affected. Their physical and mental conditions may not be able to afford the load. Even worse, some laborers may face extremely tragic consequences, such as committing suicide, or getting karoshi (death from overwork). How to seek for a balance in between has become an issue worthy of further exploration.
The paper not only reviews the various important conditions
stipulated in Article 84-1 of Labor Standards Act, but also checks the reasonableness of the system of job responsibility from different angles, including “whether the system of job responsibility should exist,” “application scope of the system of job responsibility” and “applicability of ruling out of part of the stipulations of Labor Standards Act.” Finally, the study gives a suggestion of amending the Act, with an expectation to solve the controversies between employers and employees.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、責任制之法律規範及運用(濫用)概況
一、勞動基準法規定之責任制
二、目前經核定公告適用之責任制專業人員
三、地方主管機關對於約定書之審查基準
四、由勞資訴訟看責任制之濫用概況
參、合理性之探討
一、存在之合理性
二、範圍之合理性
三、排除勞動基準法部分規定適用之合理性
四、沒有責任制,就沒有目前之弊病?
肆、檢討及建議
一、對於勞動基準法第八十四條之一規定之檢討及建議
二、對於勞動基準法施行細則規定之檢討及建議
三、加強勞動檢查及加重處罰
四、團體協商制度之落實
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
陳旻沂,勞工「責任制」工作合理性之探討,國立中正大學法學集刊,第 39 期,1-24 頁,2013年04月。
返回功能列