| 關 鍵 詞： |
專家證人；傳聞法則；鑑定報告；對質詰問權；交互詰問 |
| 中文摘要： |
在目前的刑事司法實務中，多數鑑定報告被認為具有證據能力，但有學者卻認為如此則剝奪了被告的對質詰問權，遂認為此觀點不合憲，然而，此觀點並非表示專家證人不需要經過交互詰問，在現今制度下，即便鑑定報告在審判中具有證據能力，專家證人有時仍會被兩造聲請傳喚，據以評估專家證言之證明力，是故，當專家證人受到傳喚時，仍有義務到法院作證。
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、專家證言及鑑定報告之證據能力
一、評估專家證言及鑑定報告之可靠性
（一）評估專家證言及鑑定報告可靠性之重要
（二）臺灣制度中評估專家證言及鑑定報告可靠性之考量因素
（三）美國制度中評估專家證言及鑑定報告可靠性之考量因素
（四）檢視並革新臺灣制度
二、傳聞法則與鑑定報告
（一）在傳聞法則下鑑定報告證據能力之爭議
（二）臺灣制度中鑑定報告之證據能力
（三）美國制度中鑑定報告之證據能力
（四）檢視並革新臺灣制度
參、專家證言及鑑定報告之證明力
一、專家證言及鑑定報告之證明力與對質詰問權及交互詰問之關係
二、臺灣制度之對質詰問權及交互詰問
三、美國制度之對質詰問權及交互詰問
四、檢視並革新臺灣制度
肆、結論
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports
1. Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports
a) The Significance of Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports
b) The Factors of Assessing the Reliability of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports in Taiwan's Criminal Justice System
c) The Factors of Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States' System
d) Reviewing and Reforming Taiwan's System
2. The Hearsay Rule and Expert's Reports
a) The Debate of the Admissibility of Expert's Reports Under the Hearsay Rule
b) The Admissibility of Expert's Reports in Taiwan's System
c) The Admissibility of Expert's Reports in the United States' System
d) Reviewing and Reforming Taiwan's System
Ⅲ. The Credibility of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports
1. The Relationship Between the Credibility of Expert Witness Testimony and Expert's Reports as well as the Right of Confrontation and Cross-Examination
2. The Right of Confrontation and Cross-Examination in Taiwan's System
3. The Right of Confrontation Cross-Examination in the United States'system
4. Reviewing and Reforming Taiwan's System
Ⅳ. Conclusion
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|