法學期刊
論著名稱: 醫師於醫療疏失的刑事責任(Criminal Liability of Medical Doctors for Medical Malpractices)
編著譯者: Ulrich Schroth古承宗
出版日期: 2014.03
刊登出處: 台灣/國立高雄大學法學論叢第 9 卷 第 2 期 /35-59 頁
頁  數: 22 點閱次數: 2281
下載點數: 88 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 古承宗
關 鍵 詞: 過失犯醫療疏失承諾告知說明義務緩起訴
中文摘要: 一般而言,醫療疏失於德國刑法的規範脈絡下以成立過失傷害或過失致死為主。
醫師原則上擁有醫療上的方法自由,但實施醫療違反醫療準則,即屬非容許的醫療行為。另外,若病患已經就醫療風險受充分告知,此可排除醫療行為之違法性。最後,關於醫療行為之刑事責任的限制,應當透過緩起訴制度為之,因為此一制度較有助於個案獲得確實評價,且讓程序更具彈性。
英文關鍵詞: Tort of NegligenceMedical MisconductsAgreementDuty to Inform the ExplanationDeferred Prosecution
英文摘要: Generally speaking, medical malpractices refer mainly as negligent injury or manslaughter under the sequence of ideas in German Criminal Law. Physicians have methodical individualistic in practicing medicine; however, if a practice violates guidelines of practicing medicine, it is determined as a non-permissible act of medical treatment. Further, if a patient is fully informed of a medical risk, it may preclude an act of medical treatment from illegality. Finally, criminal liability of a medical treatment shall be limited by deferred prosecution, it is conductive to cases to have precise assessments and have more flexibility in procedure.
目  次: 壹、概論
貳、醫療疏失
一、狹義的醫療疏失
二、組織分工疏失
三、說明疏失
參、德國刑法之過失犯的成立要件
一、作為與不作為
二、非容許行為
三、關鍵時點
四、醫師的方法自由
五、具拘束力的醫療標準
六、因特殊活動所造成的非容許行為
七、非容許行為的判斷標準
肆、結論
伍、醫師責任是否僅止於重大過失
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列