| 關 鍵 詞： |
切結書；行政法上意思表示；意向表示 |
| 中文摘要： |
本篇論文旨在探討行政實務中習見之切結書在行政法上意義與定位。傳統上以行政行為的角度探討，但切結書究非行政行為，而是行政與人民相互促成的結果，而多稱為準負擔。討論焦點建議置重於行政法律關係中，作為主體地位之人民為獲得特定法律效果，所為之行政法上的意思表示、協商表示或真實表示的特殊方法，係為行政與人民溝通過程中的一種特殊表達方式。因此，切結書可與實體處分或程序裁量互為關聯。本文試圖從條文分析、理由成因、理論闡述與實務見解等方面，依序說明使人民出具切結書時，基於達成何等目的、是否需要法律授權，將發生何等法律效果說明，再從中反思行政法總論未竟之議題。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
letter of guarantee；declaration of intention in the administrative law；letter of intent；affidavit |
| 英文摘要： |
This paper deals with “letter of guarantee” in the administrative law in Taiwan, which has often been used in administrative practice. The letter of guarantee is usually defined as quasi-additional obligations. However, this issue overlook the nature of administrative acts. Instead it can be used as special expression method in order to communicate with the administrative agencies. The analysis is based on administrative legal relationship between administrative agencies and citizen. It means only that in connection with administrative act. The letter of guarantee can be a type of document issued by the people promises to do something. On the other hand, the administrative agency has wide discretion in the procedure. The affidavit is a written sworn statement of fact. In the letter of intent is a document outlining an agreement between the people and administrative agencies, but are not binding on the parties. Therefore, this article discusses the special problem with the perspective of material decision and procedure discretion. The conclusions let us turn over to think the general part of administrative law.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題意識
貳、切結書與意思表示及其他
參、作為意思表示方法
肆、作為非意思表示之方法
伍、意思表示瑕疵與拘束力
陸、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|