| 關 鍵 詞： |
過失犯；醫療疏失；承諾；告知說明義務；緩起訴 |
| 中文摘要： |
一般而言，醫療疏失於德國刑法的規範脈絡下以成立過失傷害或過失致死為主。
醫師原則上擁有醫療上的方法自由，但實施醫療違反醫療準則，即屬非容許的醫療行為。另外，若病患已經就醫療風險受充分告知，此可排除醫療行為之違法性。最後，關於醫療行為之刑事責任的限制，應當透過緩起訴制度為之，因為此一制度較有助於個案獲得確實評價，且讓程序更具彈性。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Tort of Negligence；Medical Misconducts；Agreement；Duty to Inform the Explanation；Deferred Prosecution |
| 英文摘要： |
Generally speaking, medical malpractices refer mainly as negligent injury or manslaughter under the sequence of ideas in German Criminal Law. Physicians have methodical individualistic in practicing medicine; however, if a practice violates guidelines of practicing medicine, it is determined as a non-permissible act of medical treatment. Further, if a patient is fully informed of a medical risk, it may preclude an act of medical treatment from illegality. Finally, criminal liability of a medical treatment shall be limited by deferred prosecution, it is conductive to cases to have precise assessments and have more flexibility in procedure.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、概論
貳、醫療疏失
一、狹義的醫療疏失
二、組織分工疏失
三、說明疏失
參、德國刑法之過失犯的成立要件
一、作為與不作為
二、非容許行為
三、關鍵時點
四、醫師的方法自由
五、具拘束力的醫療標準
六、因特殊活動所造成的非容許行為
七、非容許行為的判斷標準
肆、結論
伍、醫師責任是否僅止於重大過失
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|