法學期刊
論著名稱: 子女利益及監護理論之新趨勢-從北院 98 年度婚字第 244 號判決談起(The New Trend of Best Interest of Child and Custody Theory)
編著譯者: 洪遠亮
出版日期: 2011.04
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 56 卷 第 2 期 /101-152 頁
頁  數: 51 點閱次數: 744
下載點數: 204 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 洪遠亮
關 鍵 詞: 子女最佳利益最大接觸原則監護權法律監護身體監護共同監護平行監護鳥巢裁判共同監護程序監理人
中文摘要: 民國 99 年間臺北地院家事法庭二件有關監護權爭議之裁判,寓有本文推薦之21世紀北美洲(特別是加拿大)所採取之監護權理論之新趨勢即最大接觸原則或善意父母原則。而加拿大立法所採行最大接觸原則,則發展出無監護權人會面交往權之擴大,法律監護及事實監護、平行監護、鳥巢裁判等,多樣化的共同監護等,亦漸為加拿大司法裁判所採納;另本文亦提供英美法中有關監護爭議案件,未成子女意見表達及程序監理人等程序上事項;以供我國司法實務處理子女監護所面臨各項問題之參考及討論基礎。
英文關鍵詞: CustodyThe Best Interest of the ChildVsitation and AccessMaximum ContactLegal CustodyPhysical CustodyParallel CustodyMultiple Joint CustodyGuardian Ad Litem
英文摘要: In 2010, Taipei District Court breach of Family made two important custody dispute adjudications, which denoting this article recommend new trend of custody theory-Maximum contact-adopted by North America in 21 century. Canadian Federal Divorce Act in article 16 use “ Maximum contact ” theory and in the judicial system expend some practical methods gradually, such as amplification the non-Guardianship member it’s visitation & access, legal custody and physical custody, parallel custody or parallel parenting, bird’s nest judgment-also called “ multiple joint custody ”. In the other hand the Anglo-American judicial system hearing the custody disputed cases have some theories and procedural method about how the child opinions can through the Guardian Ad Litem be heard by the Courts. or further discuss and for some resolution references. This article provides American-Canadian custody dispute resolution theories which can be triggered our jurisdiction system for further discuss and for some resolution references in our jurisdiction.
目  次: 壹、問題之提出
貳、離婚後子女權利義務行使負擔(監護權)之國內傳統見解
參、子女利益與加拿大法制「最大接觸」原則
肆、多樣化共同監護美加法制及觀念發展之新趨勢
伍、法院裁判可有的新觀念及想法(代結論)
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列