| 關 鍵 詞： |
社會排除；社會流動；弱勢學生；學產基金 |
| 中文摘要： |
學產基金係以不動產租金收益，挹注各項獎補助扶弱措施，以協助弱勢學生順利完成學業。故主要在以經濟扶助手段協助經濟弱勢學生，包括補助學生在校學習各種必要支出，協助遭遇急難學生克服經濟困境，提供各項獎勵措施，協助學生發展特殊專長、就業力及融入社會生活之能力。但學產基金助學措施歷經多年的推動，除達成協助弱勢學生就學及彌平貧富差距目標，仍有需多問題亟待檢討及改進，爰本文透過文件分析法，分別分析學產基金起源脈絡、具體內涵及其所欲獲致教育目的，探討學產基金現行基金來源及用途、相關補助法規及補助成效，以構成分析對象完整全貌，並提出四項具體建議：第一、積極檢討現行補助措施以發揮更大效益；第二、基金運用應鬆綁使其更為彈性；第三、充分發展經濟補助外其他教育措施；第四、有效運用民間團體及社區資源。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
disadvantaged students；education property foundation；social exclusion；social mobilization |
| 英文摘要： |
Education Property Foundation, which mainly consists of rent revenues, is set up for helping disadvantaged students smoothly complete their school work by means of various subsidies. It will be worked out with providing those in need with essential assistance so that they can fulfill themselves and explore the capabilities they may have in certain fields. Despite the outcome of taking such actions for many years, there is still room for Education Property Foundation to improve. In order to point out crucial problems which should consider and give feasible suggestions, the research forms a framework to discuss and summarize throughout document analysis method. The issues concerning background of Education Property Foundation, how to play an important role in education and the effectiveness of related regulations are all covered in the research. Based on the analyses, the following are four major suggestions. First of all, the authorities ought to actively review the existing subsidy measures to achieve greater efficiency. Secondly, the funds need a flexible way to deal with. Third, the government may thrive to find the educational initiatives other than subsidy measures. Fourth, the resources among nongovernmental organizations and communities can be fully integrated for further use.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、學產基金起源及意涵
一、學田制之起源與發展
二、清代及日本領臺時期之學田制變革
三、臺灣省政府接管後之發展概況
四、學產基金扶弱助學措施推動概況
參、學產基金扶弱措施推動成效及問題
一、推動成效
二、遭遇問題
肆、學產基金扶弱措施精進策略
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|