| 關 鍵 詞： |
政府採購犯罪；圍標；詐術圍標罪；合意圍標；犯罪參與 |
| 中文摘要： |
針對實質上形同「一人多標」的所謂借牌陪標行為，儘管多數實務見解係以政府採購法第 87 條第 3 項詐術圍標罪作為處罰依據，惟不論本條項的規範內容或判決書的理由說明，其妥當性均存在若干值得思考之處，在可供參考的同議題文獻與類似立法例均有欠缺下，本文先就相關規範略做介紹，緊接著以本土化的判決整理與分析為中心，以為解構與重構的討論基礎。從解釋論的角度觀察，實務見解透過擴張行為客體、前置刑罰介入時點的操作模式，均存在抵觸罪刑法定的疑慮，從而只能在立法論上，透過修改規範內容的方式，以為解決。就此而言，本文除了提出具體的文字修改建議，更認為刑事立法政策上，允宜整併政府採購法第 87 條第 3 項與同條第4項；在實現之前，似應改以政府採購法第 87 條第 4 項合意圍標罪，作為參與借牌陪標行為者的刑事責任依據。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
bid-rigging crime；government procurement law；fraud bid-rigging crime；bid collusion；articipation in crime |
| 英文摘要： |
Addressing actions that constitute “borrowing licenses to engage in complementary bidding” where “one person has multiple tenders”, in spite of the fact that most practical involvement believe that Article 87, Paragraph 3 of the Government Procurement Act, which concerns bid rigging and procurement fraud, should serve as a basis for punishment, the adequacy of this basis, regardless of whether explained in terms of the legal content of this clause or the reasoning in sentences, has certain issues worthy of further thought. Due to the lack of literature on this issue, or similar legislative examples, this paper first provides an introduction to relevant standards, which is followed by a summary and analysis of local judicial decisions in order to provide a basis for deconstructive and reconstructive discussion. From an explanatory angle, practical workers may encounter doubts concerning principle of legality when employing an operating model taking expansionist behavior as object and antecedent punishment as an entry point, and these doubts can other be resolved through revision of the content of statutes. With regard to this point, apart from proposing specific recommendations for textual revisions, this paper also asserts that criminal legislative policy should integrate paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 87 of the Government Procurement Act. Until this can be accomplished, Article 87, Paragraph 4 of the Government Procurement Act, which concerns bid collusion, should be taken as a legal basis for the criminal liability of those persons “borrowing licenses to engage in complementary bidding behavior”.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、圍標行為與實務操作
參、規範內容與實務檢討
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|