法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 刑事程序之公平審判原則-以武器平等為中心(Principle of a Fair Trial - Providing for Equality of Arms)
編著譯者: Sabine Gless王士帆
出版日期: 2014.06
刊登出處: 台灣/成大法學第 27 期 /165-187 頁
頁  數: 14 點閱次數: 1521
下載點數: 56 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 王士帆
關 鍵 詞: 刑事程序武器平等公平審判權利質問證人權利跨境刑事合作
中文摘要: 刑事程序的防禦方,經常自程序一開始即有處於不利一造的感受,因為所面對的追訴方,乃是集結眾多資源、取證管道、程序決定或人力等等的機關。然而,辯護律師在傳統制度上卻可能只擁有較少的資源及程序決定權等。我們有時會以聖經故事「大衛對戰歌利亞」描述這種情況。本文分析歐洲刑事程序公平審判的前提要件,將從國家司法的内國層次及歐洲跨境合作為例,觀察這一體制上弱者與體制上強者之抗衡,並以今日已成為歐洲理解之公平刑事程序核心的武器平等為焦點。
英文關鍵詞: equality of arms in criminal proceedingsright to a fair trialright to confront witnessescross-border cooperation in criminal matters
英文摘要: In criminal proceedings, the defence often may feel like being on at the disadvantaged side from the start, facing the prosecution as an institution with far more ressources, as far as power to collect evidence, decision-making in the proceeding or manpower etc. is regarded. However, defence lawyers may be less burdened with institutional tradition, hierarchical decision-making etc. Sometimes the allegory of the biblical story of David and Goliath is used to describe the situation. This perspective of the institutional weaker having to fight the institutional stronger, is taken when the article analyses the prerequisites of a fair trial in criminal proceedings in Europe, on the national level of state jurisdictions as well as on the European level of cross-border cooperation. The focus is on equality of arms which is a core aspect of the current European understanding of a fair criminal trial.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、公平審判權利
一、武器平等原則的意義
(一)Natunen v. Finnland
(二)Jasper v. the United King-dom
二、跨國刑事法上的武器平等理念?
參、公平審判與跨境合作-以歐盟為例
一、語言
二、跨境合作之結構與挑選法院
三、國外取證:依外國法取得之證據
(一)歐洲人權法院 Stojkovic v. France and Belgium
(二)假設案例
(三)德國聯邦最高法院見解
四、小結
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
    相關函釋:
      相關論著:
      返回功能列