法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 2013 年民事法發展回顧(Developments in the Law in 2013:Civil Law)
編著譯者: 吳從周
出版日期: 2014.11
刊登出處: 台灣/國立臺灣大學法學論叢第 43 卷 特刊/1127-1186 頁
頁  數: 60 點閱次數: 2824
下載點數: 240 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 國立臺灣大學法律學院
關 鍵 詞: 制定法外之法律續造依法理預約雙重債權讓與違約金物之瑕疵
中文摘要: 2013 年度的最高法院判決見解豐富,代表著最高法院法官在法學方法論個案運用上勇於嘗試且逐漸成熟,在民法釋義學上說理豐富,且引領法學理論之前進,令人佩服。特別是在民法方法論上,最高法院在判決中參考我國學說之見解,說明我國民法第 1 條法理之補充功能,包括制定法內之法律續造(如類推適用)及制定法外之法律續造(如基於事物本質及公平原則依據法理而創造法律),宣告我國全盤繼受採用德國學者 Larenz 所創設的法學方法論上三階層法律發現構造論,最受矚目!
英文關鍵詞: Judge-made law outside the lawnature of thingspreliminary contract successive assignments of the same rightliquidated damagesdefects of things
英文摘要: The rulings of the Supreme Court contain abundant opinions and insights in year 2013. It represents the Supreme Court becomes mature to apply the legal methodology on the different cases and has the courage to try it. In addition, the reasonings in the civil legal dogmatics are rich enough and through it lead legal theories forward. Especially in the civil legal methodology, after referring our legal theory archive the Supreme Court has declared in their decisions that the Taiwanese Civil Code Section 1 with the function of supplemental feature includes actually the law-making effect within the law (eg analogy applicable) and the one outside of the law to enact through judge-made law continously (such as the nature of things and based on the principle of equity to create a legal basis for things). This opinion has declared that we had adopted a comprehensive, following the creation of the German scholar Karl Larenz, so-called legal discovery of methodology constructed on three levels, which deserves more attention!
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、民法方法論
一、三階層法律發現構造論之全盤繼受
二、制定法外之法律續造:特別是「依法理」適用法律
參、民法釋義學
一、消滅時效期間與起算點
二、預約給付不能之損害賠償
三、雙重債權讓與之效力
四、違約金酌減之基本問題
五、凶宅與物之瑕疵、侵權行為
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列