| 關 鍵 詞： |
工會法；團體協約法；勞資爭議處理法；勞工；僱用關係；從屬性；團結權；企業工會；產業工會；職業工會 |
| 中文摘要： |
勞工之定義乃是勞動法之核心問題，現行工會法第四條雖規定「勞工均有組織及加入工會之權利」，然同法並未對勞工一詞有立法性定義。本文以為，各個勞動法規之立法目的並不相同，故勞工一詞之概念範圍亦應基於各個法規之屬性、立法目的等而有廣狹之別。新勞動三法施行後，我國之集體勞動關係已正式進入新紀元，鑑於新工會法第六條採工會組織多元化與自由化之立法方式，且唯有依工會法成立之工會方得成為締結團體協約之勞方當事人，故工會法中之勞工概念範圍，應著重於是否有保護其團體協商之必要性與妥當性。基此，工會法上之勞工不應以適用勞動基準法之勞工為限，若與團體協商之他方當事人具有僱用關係者，不論是否具有從屬性，即屬工會法上之勞工。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Labor Union Act；Collective Bargaining Agreement Act；Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes；Labor；Employment Relationship；Subordinate；Right to Organize；Enterprise Unions；Industrial Unions；Occupation Unions |
| 英文摘要： |
The definition of labor is the core issue in the Labor Act. In accordance with Article 4 of the existing Labor Union Act, “Laborers have the right to organize and join unions”. However, the same law does not legislatively define the term labor. According to this study, the legislative purposes of the various labor laws are deemed to be not the same. Therefore, the scope of the concept of labor should be distinguished in the broad sense and the narrow sense based on the attributes of the regulations and the legislative purposes. Following the implementation of the three labor laws, the collective employment relationship in our country has formally entered a new age. According to Article 6 of the New Labor Union Act that adopts the legislative approach of union and organization diversification and liberalization, only unions established in compliance with the Labor Union Act are eligible as labor parties for concluding group labor agreements. Hence, the scope of the labor concept in the Labor Union Act should focus on whether or not there is a need, or whether or not it is appropriate to protect group bargaining. In view of this, labor in the Labor Union Act is not only limited to labor applicable to the Labor Standards Law. Other parties engaged in group bargaining with employment relationships, regardless of subordinate, are regarded as labor in accordance with the Labor Union Act.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、我國工會法中勞工之定義
一、工會法之規定
二、舊工會法時期之相關見解
（一）主管機關意見
（二）司法院大法官會議解釋
（三）法院實務
（四）小結
三、新工會法時期之相關見解
（一）行政機關意見
（二）不當勞動行為裁決委員會見解
（三）法院實務－國立臺灣大學工會事件
（四）小結
參、日本勞動組合法中勞工之定義
一、勞動組合法之規定
二、司法實務－CBC 管弦樂團勞組事件
（一）案例事實
（二）判決理由
（三）CBC 管弦樂團勞組事件判決之意義與其影響
三、勞動組合法中勞工之概念範圍與判斷基準
（一）基本性判斷要素
（二）補充性判斷要素
（三）消極性判斷要素：明顯之事業主法性格
肆、結論
一、日本法之啟發
二、我國工會法中勞工定義之檢討
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|