| 關 鍵 詞： |
行政處分附款；附款容許性；授益之羈束處分；裁量處分；協商之附款；承諾之附款；附款合法性 |
| 中文摘要： |
行政處分附款作為行政機關於個案中用以細膩調控之機制，其附加之法容許性及合法性要件，於我國行政程序法制定之初，乃仿效德國聯邦行政程序法第 36 條立法例，分別於第 93 條及第 94 條定有一般性之規定。然而，行政程序法歷經逾十年之施行後，行政處分附款此等行政法上傳統機制，在實務操作上卻屢生若干頗值商榷及檢討之處。例如對於附款概念未能精確掌握及正確適用，附款附加偶有侵害立法權之違反權力分立原則疑慮，以及行政機關逕將人民承諾事項轉換為附款之內容，而未再依職權進行正當合理關聯之審查等。有鑑於此，本文從立法政策角度出發，針對現行行政程序法中之附款相關規定提出以下三點修正建議，俾供立法者參考：一、增訂行政處分附款之一般性概念定義；二、關於羈束行政處分附加附款之法容許性，應明文限縮在「人民享有請求行政機關作成授益行政處分」之類型上；三、明定「承諾之附款」的法容許性，並規定其內容亦應如同行政機關單方形塑之傳統附款一般，仍須具備實質合法性。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
The Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions；The permissibility of Incidental Provisions；The Restrained Administrative Dispositions to Benefit；The Administrative Dispositions to consider；negotiated provision；committed provision；the legitimacy of Incidental Provision |
| 英文摘要： |
The Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions is a method used by the administrative organization to smoothly control individual cases. The permissibility andelements of legitimacy to the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions are established in article 93 and article 94 of the Administrative Procedure Act of Taiwan. The concepts of these articles are based on article 36 of the German’s Federal AdministrativeProcedureAct. Over ten years of executing ofthe Administrative Procedure Act of Taiwan, the authorities found that the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions had some points to be discussed and reviewed when operating. For instance, the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions could not be precisely and correctly carried out. Therefore, it occasionally violates the legislative rights which might infringe the Separation of Power. Administrative organization sometimes even places its commitment to the people in the content of the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions, and later avoids its duty of reasonable investigation in the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions. Having this in mind, this article stands from the perspective of the legislative strategyin proposing three suggestions of amendments to the Articles of the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions of the Administrative Procedure Act. First of all, general definition for the Incidental Provisions of Administrative Dispositions should be added. Secondly, the incidental provisions of the Restrained Administrative Dispositions to Benefit should be legalized by regulatingthem in the category that only gives the right for the people to ask for beneficial Administrative Dispositions. Thirdly, the legitimacy of the committed provision should be proclaimed in regulation with essential legitimacysuch as those unilateral typical incidental provisions made by administrative organization.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題之提出
貳、行政處分附款概念之定義問題
參、行政處分附款之容許性
肆、附款內容形塑之協商可能性及其合法界限
伍、總結
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|