| 關 鍵 詞： |
公益代表人；追訴權；濫權追訴罪；再議；交付審判 |
| 中文摘要： |
關於檢察權的抑制，雖有基於檢察一體的自律機制，與交付審判的他律機制存在，刑法甚至有濫權追訴罪存在，但證諸於現實，這些手段的實效性，恐有疑問，則面對檢察權的抑制是否只能求諸於檢察官倫理？本文即從太極門案與江國慶案，來為濫權追訴如何為抑制的檢討。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Charity representative；Power to prosecute；Abuse of crimes prosecution；Reconsideration；Committed for trial |
| 英文摘要： |
Inhibition on prosecutorial power, although one of the self-regulatory mechanism based on prosecutors, with his legal mechanism exists to trial, criminal prosecution of the crime of abuse of power and even the existence, but evidenced in reality, the effectiveness of these measures, fear of doubt, the the face of prosecutorial power to suppress whether prosecutors can only recourse to ethics? This article is from Chiang Tai Ji Men and Chiang Kuo-ching case to the prosecution on how to curb abuses review.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、檢察官倫理規範
參、濫用追訴權的抑制
肆、檢察官積極訴追之濫用－以太極門案為例
伍、檢察官消極不訴追之濫用－以江國慶案為例
陸、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|