法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
未遂犯的處罰依據其及影響
文獻引用
編著譯者: 蕭宏宜
出版日期: 2015.04
刊登出處: 台灣/東海大學法學研究第 45 期/37-98 頁
頁  數: 34 點閱次數: 2874
下載點數: 136 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 蕭宏宜
關 鍵 詞: 未遂客觀未遂理論主觀未遂理論實行行為不能未遂
中文摘要: 為什麼處罰要處罰未遂行為的問題,在刑法學界的討論已經超過百年。實際上,這個問題與刑罰目的理論、不法理論均有緊密的關聯,並且,在這樣的關聯中清晰地展現出未遂理論過去和現在的歷史變化。本文試圖釐清未遂犯的處罰依據,並說明行為無危險的不能未遂,連著手都沒有,觀念上根本不是未遂犯,不構成犯罪。
英文關鍵詞: AttemptObjective Theory of AttemptSubjective Theory of AttemptPerpetrating ActAttempt of Impossibility
英文摘要: The question that why punish the crime of attempt have discussed more than hundred years and have long occupied the imaginations of scholars of criminal laws. Actually, the issues involved are here the fundamental issues of theories of purpose of punishment and Unlawfulness. In order to understand the theoretical history of the issues and the Stand of today’s discussion in Germany and U.S. as well as the focus shall be shifted toward and the possibility of development in the future, it is necessary to introduce and outline the history of theoretical challenges and developments of punishing the crime of attempt.
This article discusses the concept and characteristics of attempting to commit an offense, and then analyzes the incapable attempted crime(impossible attempt). Finally, I argued that due to lake of formal and essential characteristics of a crime, attempt of impossibility is not a crime and should not be punished.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、未遂理論的發展
一、未遂犯的不法內涵
二、擺盪在客觀與主觀之間
參、德、美的實踐取徑
一、德國的轉變軌跡
二、美國的思考模式
肆、處罰基礎的實然與應然
一、印象理論的困境
二、訴諸規範效力理論?
三、以安全感受威脅作為未遂處罰基礎
四、行為無危險的不能犯
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
蕭宏宜,未遂犯的處罰依據其及影響,東海大學法學研究,第45期,37-98頁,2015年04月。
返回功能列