法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
少子化下大學教師介聘與資遣問題之研究(Problems Arising from Universities in Assisting Transfer and Lay off Teachers under the Crisis of Low Birth Rate)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 楊智傑
出版日期: 2015.08
刊登出處: 台灣/法令月刊第 66 卷 第 8 期/79-102 頁
頁  數: 20 點閱次數: 2060
下載點數: 80 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 楊智傑
關 鍵 詞: 教師法輔導遷調介聘教師評審委員會教師資遣少子化
中文摘要: 少子化浪潮下,大專院校面臨嚴峻的招生危機。而教師法第 15 條規定,若系所招生不足時,學校應先輔導遷調介聘該老師至其他系所,若無法調任至其他工作,則可將教師資遣。而教師法第 15 條之 1 又規定,當教師被介聘到其他系所時,教評會因該教師有教師法第14條不適任教師之情況,得不同意聘任該老師。因此,在少子化下,各大學(尤其是私立大學)未來將面臨愈來愈多的教師資遣問題。
本文就教師法第 15 條及第 15 條之 1 之解釋,以及實務運作上的各種現況,切分為四個面向,進行分析。並從各級行政法院蒐集到的案例,進行分類整理,並進行深入探討。本文提出,教師法第 15 條及第 15 條之 1 的精神,在於保障既有教師之權益。而目前各校對於系所裁撤後教師的處理,有時並沒有保障既有教師權益。
英文關鍵詞: Teacher’s ActAssisting Transfer TeachersTeachers’ Review Committee of the SchoolLay Off TeachersPhenomenon of Low Birth Rate
英文摘要: Under phenomenon of low birth rate, universities face the difficulty of enrolling students. According Article 15 of Teacher’s Act, when departments or graduate institutes can’t enroll enough students, the school shall first assist transfer those qualified teachers to other department or graduate institute; those who have no other suitable work to transfer shall be reported to the authorized educational authorities and may be laid off after approval. According Article 15-1, when teachers who are first assisted to transfer by schools may not be employed if found in any of the situations mentioned in the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 14 by the Teachers’ Review Committee of the school. Thus, universities in Taiwan, especially private universities, will face more issues of laying off teacher in the future.
Firstly, the interpretations and practices of Article 15 and Article 15-1 of Teacher’s Act will be analyzed in four aspects. Then, judicial opinions by Administrative Courts on these issues will be collected, classified and discussed deeply. Lastly, author suggests that, the spirit of Article 15 and Article 15-1 of Teacher’s Act is to protect the rights and interests of teachers who had already been employed on the job. And for now, some universities didn’t guarantee the legal interests of teachers who had already been employed on the job when their department has to be closed.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、招生不足之教師調任與解聘
一、中小學考量與大學考量截然不同
二、「遇缺不補」或「以新汰舊」策略
三、介聘後教評會是否可以拒絕
四、資遣之程序
參、行政法院判決見解
一、案件蒐集
二、仁德醫專案:鐘點是否不足
三、稻江科技管理學院案:校方是否輔導遷調、介聘
四、東南科大案:轉任他系被拒絕
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
楊智傑,少子化下大學教師介聘與資遣問題之研究,法令月刊,第 66 卷 第 8 期,79-102 頁,2015年08月。
返回功能列