法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
併購契約之侵權行為責任(A Merger Contract involving Tortious Liabilities)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 張瑋心
出版日期: 2016.04
刊登出處: 台灣/軍法專刊第 62 卷 第 2 期/144-176 頁
頁  數: 33 點閱次數: 1768
下載點數: 132 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 軍法專刊社 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 合併收購契約法併購倫理侵權責任
中文摘要: 雖說企業可以藉由合併及收購的手段去壯大實體規模、順便整合資源,以換取更高的市占率與競爭地位,不諱言此乃成功併購所帶來的利基,蓋透過購買取代創建子公司不僅省時省力,普遍能預期創造一加一大於二的效果。然,併購也可能付出鉅額代價、招致官司災難。二十世紀美國德士古石油(Texaco Oil)收購蓋蒂石油(Getty Oil)導致破產,就是一個血淋淋的失敗案例;而台灣明基併購德國西門子、國巨收購菲利蒲的被動元件部門,也都經驗了慘烈教訓。尤當德士古石油併購案中的目標公司- 蓋蒂石油因拒絕履行與賓茲石油公司(Pennzoil)的併購契約,而改以接受德士古石油的高價收購後,所引致 Pennzoil 與 Texaco 之間長達四年的一連串訴訟事件。本文爰引介美國德士古石油公司收購蓋蒂石油公司一案,說明併購行為因受到契約法的拘束,而可能產生企業併購倫理、履行契約義務等侵權賠償責任。
英文關鍵詞: MergerAcquisitionContract LawMerger’s EthicsTortious Liability
英文摘要: Although companies can expand their entity scales through merger and acquisition (M&A), and by the way accomplish integration of resources, in exchange for greater market share, and obtain a better competitive position, it has no doubt that a successful acquisition will bring a niche instead of establishing subsidiaries, which not only saves time and effort but also expects to create the effect of one plus one greater than two. However, a failed merger may also pay a huge price and result in legal disasters afterwards. For example, in the 20th century, the United States incorporation, filed for bankrupt after acquisition of, which was considered a bloody failure. While the Taiwanese, Continental Systems Incorporation, acquired Germany Siemens’s passive components department and Corporation acquired department, have also experienced bitter lessons. In the litigations of merger case, as the target company who refused to comply with merger contract, turned to accept the Texaco Incorporation’s better offers, which later brought about subsequently a series of lawsuits. This paper aims to discuss the case of, accounts for how a merger is bound by the contract law, and consequently a merger’s acquisition ethics, contractual obligations, a s well as tort liability may arise.
目  次: 壹、併購的概念意涵
一、收購
二、合併
貳、請求履行併購契約
一、台灣強訊郵通併購達訊公司案
二、美國賓茲石油併購蓋蒂石油案
參、德州法院裁判 Pennzoil v. Texaco 案
一、事實經過
二、爭點
三、裁判結果
肆、聯邦法院裁判 Texaco v. Pennzoil 案
一、事實經過
二、爭點
三、適用法律
四、美國最高法院意見
五、裁判結果
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
張瑋心,併購契約之侵權行為責任,軍法專刊,第62卷第2期,144-176頁,2016年04月。
返回功能列