法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 國際商事管轄合意-評最高法院一○一年台抗字第二五九號民事裁定(International Forum-Selection Clauses-A Comment on Decision of Supreme Court of Taiwan, Inpro II. v. LiteOn Technology Corp., 3.29.2012)
編著譯者: 陳瑋佑
出版日期: 2013.06
刊登出處: 台灣/中華國際法與超國界法評論第 9 卷 第 1 期 /139-163 頁
頁  數: 25 點閱次數: 828
下載點數: 100 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 陳瑋佑
關 鍵 詞: 國際管轄合意之要件國際管轄合意之效力布魯塞爾第一規則海牙選擇法庭條約當事人自治原則
中文摘要: 從最高法院一○一年台抗字第二五九號民事裁定及歷審裁判觀之,在我國國際管轄合意法上仍存在有待討論之基本問題:國際管轄合意的法律基礎為何?判斷國際管轄合意是否成立生效的要件準據法為何?受國際管轄合意選定之受訴法院得否以系爭案件無除該協議本身以外之內國關連性為由拒絕行使管轄權?國際管轄合意文義不明時應依據何國法律進行解釋?是否應推定該合意具有排他效力?國際管轄合意的客觀效力範圍是否應推定及於所有權利保護形式及契約外競合之請求權基礎?受訴法院得否以承認管轄合意之拘束力有背誠信原則或內國公序良俗而否定其效力?有鑑於上開疑義之澄清於國際商事交易上有重大意義,本文乃進行比較法的觀察,一方面著重真正意義的國際民事訴訟法如歐洲布魯塞爾第一規則及二○○五年海牙選擇法庭條約之引介,另方面借鏡歐陸內國法及美國法的發展,嘗試反省我國國際民事訴訟法應有之走向。
英文關鍵詞: element of international forum-selection clauseeffect of international forum-selection clauseBrussels I RegulationHague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005principle of party autonomy
英文摘要: Through the analyze of the commented decision of Supreme Court of Taiwan and those of the lower instances, it turns out that there are still some basic questions related to international forum-selection clauses to be clarified within the Taiwanese legal system, such as: what is the legal fundament of an international forum-selection clause, which law is to apply to judge whether this clause comes in to existence, whether the court seised could deny its international jurisdiction with the reason that except for the clause itself the case shows no any other connection to the court, how should the clause be interpreted if its wording is not clear enough and according to which applicable law, whether or not should this clause to be assumed to have the exclusive effect, to which extent the clause should objectively bind the disputes of the parties, and finally, whether the court seised could break through the binding effect of the clause by applying the principle of good faith or public policy? Because of the immense importance of reasonable judgments to these problems in the field of international transactions, this article tries to build the base for the further discussion of our international civil procedural law by means of a comparative study of international treaties and internal laws in continental Europe and the USA.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、本案涉訟經過
一、事實
二、第一審法院裁判(智慧財產法院九十九年民專訴字第二一二號民事裁定)
三、第二審法院裁判(智慧財產法院一○○年民專抗字第十號民事裁定)
四、第三審法院裁判(最高法院一○一年台抗字第二五九號民事裁定)
參、國際管轄合意的基本爭點
一、國際管轄合意的法理及法律基礎
(一)當事人自治原則
(二)國際及內國管轄合意規範
二、國際管轄合意之要件
三、國際管轄合意之效力
肆、本案總評
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列