| 關 鍵 詞： |
侵害專利權；損害賠償；專利法第85條第1項；律師費用 |
| 中文摘要： |
本文係透過學理與實務裁判之檢視，分別對美國及台灣侵害專利權之損害賠償範圍進行探討與比較之研究。由於我國現行專利法第 85 條第 1 項之規定忽略專利權人於專利被侵害期間尚有其他原因可能造成營業損失，違反損害賠償之基本原則，故建議應予刪除該項之規定，修正現行專利權被侵害時計算損害額度之方式。此外，為防止侵權人輕率並明知地侵害有效之專利權，並回復被侵害之一造至被侵害前之狀態，法院在侵權行為係出於明知之情形下，應得判給勝訴之一造合理的律師費用。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
patent infringements；the compensatory damages；the Paragraph 1 of Article 85 of Taiwan's Patent Law；attorneys' fees |
| 英文摘要： |
Through the survey of academic issues and judicial practices, this study will make a research and comparison between the scope of the compensatory damages incurred from patent infringements of the U.S. and that of Taiwan's. Because the Paragraph 1 of Article 85 of Taiwan's Patent Law omits some other causes that may cause injury to the patentee, and hence violates the basic principle of compensatory damages, this study suggests that this Paragraph should be deleted and the method of calculating damages also be revised. Besides, to prevent willful and reckless infringement of valid patents, and to return the injured party to the position before injury, the court should be able to award reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party where the infringement is willful.
|
| 目 次： |
1.前言
2.美國關於侵害專利權損害賠償範圍之制度
3.我國關於侵害專利權損害賠償範圍之制度
4.美國與我國關於侵害專利權損害賠償範圍之比較分析
5.評估與建議
6.結語
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|