法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
食品安全刑事責任之分析(An Analysis of Criminal Liability for Food Safety)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 邱錦添
出版日期: 2016.12
刊登出處: 台灣/軍法專刊第 62 卷 第 6 期/133-146 頁
頁  數: 14 點閱次數: 1409
下載點數: 56 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 軍法專刊社 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 刑事責任旋轉門條款犯罪行為人嚴格責任Park 法則追繳追徵抵償資格刑
中文摘要: 食品安全之刑事責任,係就民事責任與行政責任外之另一責任規定,因各國立法制度之不同,有的國家直接規定於食安法中,如台灣,有的國家以訂旋轉條款方式適用刑法,如中國大陸,有的國家則另訂在單行法規中,食安法不加規定,如日本。本文除介紹我國食安法中之刑事責任規定,並分析其不同外,特別介紹美國 Park 法則在食安危害刑事訴追上的運用與啟示,以作借鏡說明,提供食品界及法界人士之參考。
英文關鍵詞: Criminal LiabilityRotating TermsThe PerpetratorThe Strict LiabilityThe Park DoctrineRecovered Pursued Payment CompensationPunishment Against Qualifications
英文摘要: Criminal liability for violations of food safety is different from either civil liability or administrative liability for violations of food safety. Since different countries have different legislative systems, therefore, some countries would regulate it directly by food safety law, like that in Taiwan. Some countries would set rotating terms for application of its criminal law, such as China. And some countries would have another separate regulation in this regard instead of being regulated by food security law, say, Japan.
This article, apart from introducing and analyzing the provisions of the criminal liabilities in the ROC Food Safety Law, would in particular introduce the application and the enlightenments of the application of the PARK Rule, USA to the Criminal prosecution. This article would be a very helpful reference available for both people from the food industry and the legal profession.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、刑事責任之意義與種類
參、食品安全刑事處罰之立法形式
肆、我國食安法規定之刑事犯罪與處罰
伍、美國經驗法則之啟示
陸、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
邱錦添,食品安全刑事責任之分析,軍法專刊,第62卷第6期,133-146頁,2016年12月。
返回功能列