法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 食品攙偽或假冒的抽象危險犯辯證(An Argumentation on the Offender of Abstract Danger of Adulterated or Counterfeited Food)
編著譯者: 張麗卿
出版日期: 2017.01.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 261 期 /76-96 頁
頁  數: 21 點閱次數: 966
下載點數: 84 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張麗卿
關 鍵 詞: 食品安全抽象危險犯攙偽或假冒最高法院一○五年度第十七次刑事庭會議決定最高法院一○五年度第十八次刑事庭會議決議
中文摘要: 正確妥當的適用法律,是法院的重要工作。法官不是藝人,法官的任務不在取悅社會大眾,而是守住刑法的界線。守住刑法的界線,並非避卻五穀,而是法律適用的論理上必須無懈可擊。最高法院一○五年度第十八次刑事庭會議決議,面對紛擾的實務意見及學說爭議,挺身而出、仗義執言,清楚說明食安法第四九條第一項的攙偽或假冒屬於抽象危險犯的立法意旨,以及該條項係為維護國人健康、消費者權益等多元法益。該項決議一方面守住刑法的界線,另一方面也指出正確適用法律的精確法理。益眾利民、殊堪敬佩。
英文關鍵詞: Adulterated or CounterfeitedFood SafetyOffender of Abstract Danger2016 17th Decision of Criminal Divisions Conference of Supreme Court2016 18th Resolution of Criminal Divisions Conference of Supreme Court
英文摘要: The primary task of the court is to apply laws accurately and properly. Surely there is no need for the court to satisfy the public opinion, but the courthave to deal with those high-profile food safety cases with muchmore caution. The reasoning part of legal applicationin particular must be flawless and convincing, otherwise it would be hard for the judicial branch to play a role in balancing social interests or might even raisebad criticism. Judges are not entertainers; their task is not to please the publicbut to guard the boundary of Criminal Code, which meansthat the judge are supposed to make accurate and proper decisions instead of living in their own ivory tower. Fortunately, the 18th Resolution of Criminal Divisions Conference of Supreme Court in 2016 clarified that the offense described in the article 49 section 1 of Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation is an Offender of Abstract Danger, and the legislative purpose of that article is to protect the legal interests such as the health of citizens and the rights of consumers. On one hand, this resolution of Supreme Court guards the bottom line of Criminal Code successfully and responses to the legislative purposes faithfully; on the other hand, it also shows anaccurate result of the application of the Act.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、食安法多重的法益保護
參、食品攙偽或假冒的處罰層次
肆、實務意見的分歧與定調
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列