| 關 鍵 詞： |
贍養費；兩願離婚；裁判離婚；扶養請求權；法律漏洞 |
| 中文摘要： |
贍養費為夫妻間離婚後的扶養請求權，但關於贍養費制度的條文卻僅有民法第 1057 條，且又限定僅有裁判離婚始有適用。然實務上諸多紛爭的離婚協議約定贍養費事件，應如何在實體法以及程序法上定性，即為重要的課題。
我國民法親屬編自從民國 19 年起草制定後，民法第 1057 條之條文即未修正，該條文排除了兩願離婚協議贍養費的適用，是為立法者有意排除？或是法律漏洞？即生疑義。又家事事件法中針對兩願離婚所生之贍養費其類型為何？亦有爭議。
本文從民法第 1057 條之制定歷史出發，探討系爭規定的立法意旨以及在法律上的定性性質，以供實務參酌。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Alimony；Voluntary Divorce；Divorced Via the Judgment；Maintenance；Legal Loophole |
| 英文摘要： |
Alimony is a legal obligation on a person to provide financial support to their spouse after divorce, but in the whole civil law provision there only is one article about it, which is article 1057 of the Civil Code provisions, and limits the definition of divorce to when the judicial divorce is made sure. It is crucial to understand how alimony should be characterized in substantive law and procedural law.
Since family law was drafted in 1930, we have never corrected article 1057 of the Civil Code provisions, which excluded the application of consensual divorce alimony. Was it an intentional choice of the legislator in order to exclude consensual divorce alimony or it creates loopholes in the law? This is the point that needs to be cleared. According to the Family Proceedings Act, what type of alimony is granted during divorced by mutual agreement? This is also quite controversial.
This article will start from how article 1057 of the Civil Code provisions came to be, discusses the legislative purposes of the provisions and the legal characterization for court as reference.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題之起源
貳、民法親屬編制定之歷史軌跡
一、關於贍養費之立法歷史沿革
二、國外立法例與我國立法體例之異同
參、民法第 1057 條之規範漏洞
一、契約自由架空法院之實質審查
二、最高法院 28 年上字第 487 號判例之解釋
肆、現行法架構的解釋論方向
一、實體法定性
二、程序法定性
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|