法學期刊
論著名稱: 主治醫師與專科護理師之醫療分工類型-兼論主治醫師之監督過失責任(The Specialized Labor Division between the Attending Physician and Nurse Practitioner Analyzing the Negligent Supervision of Attending Physician)
編著譯者: 邱慧洳
出版日期: 2017.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 7 期 /41-50 頁
頁  數: 10 點閱次數: 888
關 鍵 詞: 主治醫師信賴原則專科護理師監督過失醫療分工
中文摘要: 專科護理師之執業範圍包括:一、於醫師監督下所得執行之醫療業務;二、於醫師指示下所得執行之醫療輔助行為。護理人員法第 24 條第 3 項後段規定直接挑明專科護理師應於醫師監督下執行「醫療業務」,法律已定調主治醫師與專科護理師屬垂直分工,主治醫師對專科護理師之過失,原則上無法主張信賴原則而免責。然而專科護理師執行「醫療輔助行為」時,其與主治醫師屬何種分工類型,主治醫師對專科護理師之過失可否主張信賴原則而免責,主治醫師應否負監督過失責任,茲有疑義。本文試就專科護理師所執行者為「醫療業務」或「醫療輔助行為」而分述主治醫師與專科護理師之分工類型與主治醫師之監督過失責任。
英文關鍵詞: attending physicianprincipe of reliancenurse practitionernegligent supervisionspecialized labor division
英文摘要: The scope of practice of nurse practitioners(NPs) includes medical interventions and medical assisting interventions. The Paragraph 3 of Article 24 of Nurses Act regulates that NPs implementing medical intervention should be under the supervision of attending physicians.The law dictates the specialized labor division between the attending physicians and NPs as virtual division and, thus, attending physician could not apply the principle of reliance and declare not negligent. While NPs implement medical assisting interventions, what kind of division between attending physicians and NPs and whether the attending physicians could apply the principle of reliance and declare not negligent are questioned. This article intends to analyze those questions above.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、分工類型與信賴原則
參、主治醫師與專科護理師分工類型與主治醫師之監督過失責任
肆、本文見解-代結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列