| 關 鍵 詞： |
非刑事拘禁；法官保留原則；釋字第 708 號解釋；移民拘留；收容者 |
| 中文摘要： |
本文主要討論大法官會議釋字第 708 號解釋關於移民拘留的問題。鑒於系爭解釋將移民拘留解為確保後續驅逐出境處分續行的手段，本文主張基於如此目的，並無法合法地將其延伸至由該號解釋所創的行政便利功能。雖然移民拘留與刑事拘禁不論在概念上或憲法上均有所別，以「暫時性」為由拘束個人的自由，相對於其他預防性的拘禁措施，仍無法認為系爭解釋已然滿足正當法律程序的保障要求。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Noncriminal detention；principle of reservation by the judges；J. Y. interpretation No. 708；immigration detention；detainees |
| 英文摘要： |
This article is mainly discussing about the immigration detention problem that was interpreted by J. Y. Interpretation No. 708. Whereas the J. Y. justified immigration detention as a means of ensuring immigration compliance, this article has argued that such purpose cannot legitimately be extended to immigration detention’s newly administrative-convenience function. Although immigration detention should preserve the conceptual and constitutional distinctions between the rationales for criminal detention, using temporality as an excuse to detain individuals cannot deem as sufficient due process procedural safeguards comparing with other preventive measures.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、評析
一、從收容的本質談起
二、客製化的人權保障
三、「非刑事」的虛與實
參、比較法的觀察
一、美國實務的操作軌跡
二、歐洲人權公約的影響
三、小結－－釋字第 708 號解釋以後
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|