法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 論使用僭越之可罰-共享經濟對刑事保護財產之啟發(Possibility of Penalties for furtum usus──The Inspiration from Sharing Economy to the Criminal Protection of Property)
編著譯者: 許絲捷
出版日期: 2017.12
刊登出處: 台灣/成大法學第 34 期 /119-155 頁
頁  數: 22 點閱次數: 1162
下載點數: 88 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 許絲捷
關 鍵 詞: 共享經濟不法所有意圖竊盜使用僭越無權使用
中文摘要: 近年來,Uber、Airbnb 的大受歡迎,昭示著共享經濟模式的崛起。面對新興經濟模式對社會的影響,現行以刑事來保護財產的手段是否足以因應未來可能的侵害型態。換言之,共享經濟的新經濟模式是否會影響現今以刑事手段保護財產的面向,是本文欲探討之課題。在面對未知的未來之前,應先觀察目前保護財產手段,本文以典型的取得犯罪-竊?罪為主軸進行探討。接著,研究面對以使用為核心的共享經濟所能採取的可能刑事手段規制,最後進而提出共享經濟對刑事財產保護可能的啟發,期能對未來共享經濟社會中所面對的財產侵害提供得以進一步研究之參考。
英文關鍵詞: sharing economythe illegal intent of appropriationoffenses of larcenyfurtum ususunlawful disposition
英文摘要: The extraordinary popularity of Uber and Airbnb in recent years denotes the rise of the shared economic model. Facing the impact of emerging economic models on society, questions exist as to whether the current means of protecting property through criminal law procedures are sufficient to cope with possible future forms of infringement. In other words, will the new “sharing economy” economic model affect the protection of property currently afforded through criminal law? That is the subject this paper attempts to explore. Before facing an unknown future, we should first observe the current means protecting property. This paper will carry out an exploration of this, using a typical crime - theft - as its keystone. We will then go on to discuss the possible rules and regulations of criminal law which can be adopted in the sharing economy, taking usage as the core. Finally, some possible inspirations to protect property in the sharing economy are presented, in the hope of being able to provide references for further study regarding the future property infringements we face in the sharing economy society.
目  次: 壹、前言--從共享經濟崛起談起
貳、刑法史上竊盜犯罪的流變
參、以所有為核心的財產保護思維
一、竊盜罪的保護法益--所有?持有?
二、不法所有意圖的「所有」
三、小結
肆、保護使用權?--民刑法交錯的空間
一、對使用權的保護手段--刑事不法與民事不法
二、例外予以處罰的使用僭越--以德國無權使用他人交通工具罪為例
三、小結
伍、代結語--使用權或將成為刑事保護財產的面向之一

相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列