法學期刊
論著名稱: 債權之雙重讓與及將來債權之讓與(The Double Assignment of Claims and Assignment of Future Claims)
編著譯者: 林大洋
出版日期: 2018.01
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 63 卷 第 1 期 /55-84 頁
頁  數: 30 點閱次數: 1902
下載點數: 120 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 法學叢刊雜誌社
關 鍵 詞: 債權讓與債權之雙重讓與將來債權之讓與準物權行為處分行為
中文摘要: 債權讓與契約為準物權行為及處分行為,債權人如將同一權權為雙重讓與時,第一受讓人基於準物權行為及處分行為之特性,固已有效取得債權。惟此際關於第二次讓與行為之效力如何?學說及實務上一向存在有效說、無效說、效力未定說及通知生效說,其中以無效說與效力未定說為較多學者所主張,該二說長期以來各執己見,僵持不下,為民法上長久以來懸而未決之重大爭議問題,亟待釐清。又隨著資本主義自由經濟制度之高度發達,及國際貿易之普及,將來債權如應收帳款債權之讓與,正逐漸興起,現行民法對於此種新型態之行為,是否具有足夠作全面性規範之能力?亦屬不可忽視之課題。本文特針對上述二問題,分析評述學說與實務上相關見解,並提出個人淺見,以供實務界參考。
英文關鍵詞: Assignment of ClaimsDouble Assignment of ClaimsAssignment of Future ClaimsQuasi-real RightAct of Disposition
英文摘要: The agreement on assignment of claims is quasi-real right and the act of disposition. When debtors make their debts as double assignment of claims, based on the characteristics of quasi-real right and act of disposition, the primary assignee has obtained claims. In that case, how is the effect of second assignment of claims? There has been the argument of validity, invalidity, undecided effect, and effect upon notice. Among all, more scholars advocate invalidity and undecided effect and both insist its own view. This issue has been controversial for a long time and is necessary to be cleared. With highly developed capitalism and free market, along with popular international trade, issues related to assignment of future claims, such as assignment of accounts receivable, are gradually rising. Does our current civil law have a comprehensive specification regarding our new way of transaction? This issue should not be ignored. This article addresses on the above issues, analyzes and comments on the points of view both in the theory and practice, and brings up personal opinions as reference for practitioners.
目  次: 壹、緒論
貳、債權之雙重讓與
參、將來債權之讓與
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列