關 鍵 詞: |
環境刑法;具體危險犯;累積犯;客觀歸責 |
中文摘要: |
刑法第 190 條之 1 第 1 項作為所謂的「累積的具體危險犯」,其客觀不法的評價必須考慮到不法構成要件行為、污染結果、危險結果三者之間的歸責關聯。總體來說,污染的累積性問題無法借助累積犯的類型定位獲得解決,反而會使本罪之適用產生處罰過度前置的問題。此外,若是就累積性的污染結果採取總體結果歸責方法,形同捨棄自我負責與回溯禁止等原則,導致原本強調可支配性的客觀結果歸責,不當地轉向於純粹技術性的危險抑制思維。
|
英文關鍵詞: |
Environmental Criminal Law;Concrete Offense;Accumulative Offense;Objective Imputation |
英文摘要: |
The objective wrongfulness of the “Accumulative Concrete Offense” in §190-1 of the Criminal Code shall be considered of its imputable association among elements of a crime, damages of a result and danger of an offense. This article finds that, defining the type of recidivists may not resolve issues of accumulative offenses, in contrast to, it creates a penalty prerequisite problem. Furthermore, adopting the imputation of the general damages of a result is as if abandoning the principle of self-responsibility and resource ban; consequently, the original predominant imputation may be impoliticly turned to purely oppressing thoughts of endangerment.
|
目 次: |
壹、前言 貳、日月光案之分析與檢討 參、累積性之污染結果與具體危險的歸責關聯 肆、所謂的「總體結果歸責」 伍、結論
|
相關法條: |
 |
相關判解: |
 |
相關函釋: |
 |
相關論著: |
 |