關 鍵 詞: |
限制出境;羈押;保釋;正當法律程序;旅行權 |
中文摘要: |
雖現行刑事訴訟法並無限制出境之規範,然刑事妥速審判法卻僅就其期限訂有明文。關於限制出境之內涵與要件,因法未明文,以至於法院實際上扮演立法者的角色。基於權力分立之觀點,相關司法實務是否有權對此予以規範,恐非無疑,而司法權所為之填補,其內涵是否符合正當法律程序之要求,亦有待釐清。本文嘗試借鑑美國法制上有關羈押保釋與限制出境之法制發展,以釐清相關正當法律程序之內涵,並在我國與美國相關法制之差異上,指出我國將來在修正與建構限制出境法制時,所應注意之事項,以為參考。
|
英文關鍵詞: |
Restriction on Travel Abroad;Detention;Bail;Due Process of Law;Right to Travel |
英文摘要: |
Although the current Criminal Procedure Code does not provide any article about the restriction on travel abroad, the Criminal Speedy Trial Act limits the length of it in certain trials. Courts play the main role to regulate this issue due to the lack of legislation in fact. However, it is questionable whether courts have the right to do it from the viewpoint of Separation of Power, and if the related rulings meet the due process requirement is also unclear. This study tries to clarify the due process in this issue by referring to its counterpart in the United States and points out the noteworthy issues concerned for the future promulgation.
|
目 次: |
壹、前言 貳、現行法制疑義 參、美國羈押保釋法制沿革與概況 肆、出境限制之正當法律程序 伍、比較檢討 陸、結論
|
相關法條: |
|
相關判解: |
|
相關函釋: |
|
相關論著: |
|