法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 「改革」大纛下的勇敢「說法」?-「許宗力法院」第一年即展現司法積極主義(First Year of “Hsu Court” as Interpreter of the Constitution: Dawning of Taiwan’s Judicial Activism?)
編著譯者: 石世豪
出版日期: 2017.07
刊登出處: 台灣/憲政時代第 43 卷 第 1 期 /51-87 頁
頁  數: 26 點閱次數: 522
下載點數: 104 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 石世豪
關 鍵 詞: 違憲審查合議不同意見書反多數司法積極主義
中文摘要: 現任大法官以兼任司法院院長的大法官許宗力為首席,自 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 8 月底的 10 個月間,以明顯快於以往的速度完成多號解釋,就連議題選擇及作成解釋時機,也更加不避諱可能引發的政治社會爭議。本文分別從:誰?對哪些議題?關於憲法有怎麼個「說法」?又讓憲法如何「與時俱進」?四方面,回顧其近一年內所作解釋的「整體展現的見解與風格」。藉由比較稍早的「賴浩敏法院」在相當期間內所作解釋,本文發現:「許宗力法院」雖然也延續歷來大法官解釋風格,在對於人民聲請解釋案件上「有求必應」方面則轉趨積極;在引人側目的釋字第 748 號解釋上,「許宗力法院」甚至自承「懍於憲法職責」勉力作成解釋。
英文關鍵詞: Judicial ReviewDecision-MakingDissentingAnti-MajoritarianJudicial Activism
英文摘要: The Justices of the Constitutional Court headed by Chief Justice Hsu took over the authority of judicial review since November 2016. Till the end of August 2017 they have delivered 12 interpretations. Comparing to the Rai Court before it, this article argues that the Hsu Court rendered its decisions more frequent and its verdicts seemed closer to the people. It should be something more than coincidence that most justices nominated by President Tsai echoed some liberaltarian-styled proposals from legislators of the ruling party during the confirmation hearing. In its interpretation No. 748 upholding the freedom of same-sex marriage the Hsu Court even expressed its enthusiasm calling that “it is the constitutional duty of this Court to render a binding judicial decision, in time ...”.
目  次: 壹、新人新調:大法官組成的變化
貳、燒三把火:解釋量與議題選擇
參、有求必應:高度關注下跨大步
肆、寧靜革命:憲法的活化或新生
伍、隱身憲法之中的憲法守護者:代結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列