| 關 鍵 詞： |
陪審；裁判員；責任能力；鑑定人；精神鑑定 |
| 中文摘要： |
人民參與審判是司法院在這幾年極力所推動的制度，只是此制度從一開始以觀審名之，卻在輿論壓力下，又再更名為人民參審，已足以顯示制度推動的倉促性。比鄰之日本，為了裁判員制度的實施，而至少有十年的準備時間，在實施五年多後，仍出現不少問題，顯見，制度推動絕對是百年大計，致不能只是急就章。本文即從日本裁判員制度實施後，關於精神鑑定所出現的問題，來凸顯此問題。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Jury；Japanese jury；criminal responsibility；expert witness；psychiatric examination |
| 英文摘要： |
People involved in the trial is the Judicial Yuan in recent years strongly promoted by the system, but this system from the beginning to view the name of the trial, but under the pressure of public opinion, again renamed the People's assessor, have been enough to show system-driven rush of . Neighbor of Japan, in order to implement referee system, and at least ten years of preparation time, the implementation of more than five years later, still many problems, apparent, the system is definitely a long-term goal to promote, caused not just improvisation. This article is from the Japanese referee system is implemented, with regard to the problems identified by the spirit, to highlight this problem.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、日本裁判員制度所產生的審判結構變化
參、裁判員制度下的刑事鑑定－以精神鑑定為說明
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|