法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 醫師的注意義務與防衛性醫療行為(Due Diligence and Defensive Medical Treatments of Physicians)
編著譯者: 湯文章
出版日期: 2018.04
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 18 期 /143-148 頁
頁  數: 4 點閱次數: 528
下載點數: 16 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 湯文章
關 鍵 詞: 防衛性醫療行為醫療水準醫療常規
中文摘要: 病患或家屬於就診時的主訴,乃正確醫療行為之一環,若依病患或家屬就診時之主訴,以及病患臨床所呈現之徵狀,不足以使醫師依其專業知識與經驗,合理懷疑病患罹患特定疾病時,醫師縱未進行特定檢查以確診該疾病,仍不違反醫療常規,故以醫療常規作為醫師責任的客觀規範,清楚明確。實務見解有採取「醫療水準」替代「醫療常規」作為醫師注意義務的判斷基準,本文認為由於醫療水準空泛,無遵循標準,易造成醫師為避免事後的醫療糾紛,而執行防衛性醫療行為,恐會造成醫療資源浪費。
英文關鍵詞: defensive medical practicemedical levelmedical guideline
英文摘要: The chief complaint of the patient and the family members is one of the elements for rightful medical treatment. If it - including the clinical symptoms - lacks clarities to make the physician to diagnose what kind of illness the patient got, it would be not against the medical routine that the physician didn’t take any certain examination. Therefore, the medical routine as the criterion due diligence of physicians would be usual and clear. Taking the medical standard as the replacement of the medical routine to be the criterion of due diligence of physicians in the legal practice would in contrast lead to defensive medical treatments because avoiding the medical lawsuits and to wastes of medical resources, due to the medical standard is still too vague and unable to be obeyed.
目  次: 壹、案例
貳、爭點
參、解析
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列