法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 兼顧科學與敘事的專業知識可改善無法避免的醫病衝突
編著譯者: 李詩應
出版日期: 2019.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 27 期 /112-119 頁
頁  數: 5 點閱次數: 254
下載點數: 20 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 李詩應
關 鍵 詞: 後現代主義認識論科學知識敘事知識專業自慢醫病衝突
中文摘要: 本文嘗試以專業學習的知識論回溯到法實證主義、法現象學、法存在論等法學方法論,期能夠解開醫師專業自慢的疑惑,掌握某些重要且無可避免的衝突本質。科學知識不代表知識的整體,始終和敘述性的知識處於競爭和衝突中。科學知識輕視敘述性知識,但科學知識如果不求助於敘述性知識,便無法讓人知道自己是真知識。唯有理解知識的不可偏廢,必須兩者兼顧,以及意識到必然存在的衝突,才有可能改善醫病衝突糾紛不易妥適解決的現況。
英文關鍵詞: postmodern epistemologyscientific knowledgenarrative knowledgeprofessional arrogancedoctor-patient dispute
英文摘要: This article tries to draw attention to inspect the legal methodologies of legal positivism, legal phenomenology, and legal ontology based on the knowledge of professional learning. It is hoped that the wonder of physician professional arrogance can be solved and the essence of certain inevitable conflicts can be managed. Scientific knowledge does not represent the whole of knowledge, and it is always in competition and conflict with narrative knowledge. Scientific knowledge despises narrative knowledge, but if scientific knowledge does not appeal on bases of narrative knowledge, it cannot be recognized that it is true knowledge. Only by understanding the indispensability of knowledge, we must take both measures into consideration, and only when realizing that there are conflict existed, it is possible to improve the current status of disputes that are so hard to be resolved.
目  次: 壹、問題提出
貳、法學研究方法
一、法實證主義
二、Eugen Ehrlich 的活法
三、Ehrlich 與 Hans Kelsen 的論戰
參、法現象學
肆、後現代主義認識論
伍、專業學習的得與失
陸、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
    返回功能列